ARS 13-3625: Unlawful sale or purchase of children
The complete text of A.R.S. § 13-3625 on unlawful sale or purchase of children, what the State has to prove, and the sentencing range, with a violation charged as a class 5 felony and exposure reaching up to 2.5 years in prison.
As Seen On
Recognized By
Penalties for a § 13-3625 Conviction
A.R.S. § 13-3625 is the Arizona statute on unlawful sale or purchase of children. A violation is a class 5 felony, depending on the paragraph charged and what the State can prove. The maximum exposure is 2.5 years in prison.
| Class | Mitigated | Minimum | Presumptive | Maximum | Aggravated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class 5 felony | 6 months | 9 months | 1.5 years | 2 years | 2.5 years |
Felony ranges are set by A.R.S. § 13-702(D) and apply to a first felony conviction that is not dangerous and not repetitive. A dangerous offense (§ 13-704), a repetitive offense (§ 13-703) or a dangerous crime against children (§ 13-705) carries a longer range, and some carry mandatory prison with no probation. Misdemeanor maximums come from §§ 13-707 and 13-802; surcharges are added on top of every fine.
Full Text of A.R.S. § 13-3625
A. Except for adoptions pursuant to title 8, chapter 1 and guardianships pursuant to title 14, chapter 5, a person shall not sell or offer to sell a child for money or other valuable consideration and shall not purchase or offer to purchase a child in exchange for money or other valuable consideration.
B. A person who violates this section is guilty of a class 5 felony and the person is not eligible for suspension of sentence, probation, pardon or release from confinement on any basis except as specifically authorized by section 31-233, subsection A or B until the sentence imposed by the court has been served or commuted.
Source: Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-3625, Arizona Legislative Council revision of 09/19/25. Read the official text on azleg.gov. Statutes change; verify the current version before relying on it.
Related Statutes in Chapter 36 — Family Offenses
- A.R.S. § 13-3623 — Child or vulnerable adult abuse
- A.R.S. § 13-3622 — Furnishing of tobacco product, vapor product or tobacco or shisha instruments or paraphernalia to underage person
- A.R.S. § 13-3621 — Hire or use of child under sixteen for public vocation
- A.R.S. § 13-3620 — Duty to report abuse, physical injury, neglect and denial or deprivation of medical or surgical care or nourishment of minors
- A.R.S. § 13-3620.01 — False reports
- A.R.S. § 13-3619 — Permitting life, health or morals of minor to be imperiled by neglect, abuse or immoral associations
- A.R.S. § 13-3613 — Contributing to delinquency and dependency
- A.R.S. § 13-3611 — Refusal or neglect to provide for spouse
How Tamou Law Group Defends § 13-3625 Cases
A § 13-3625 case is decided by the paragraph the State charged, not by the statute as a whole. We start with the charging document and the disclosure, identify which subsection the prosecutor has to prove, and test whether the evidence actually reaches every element of it. Where the class turns on a fact such as value, an alleged injury, a prior conviction or the identity of the person involved, that fact is frequently the difference between a class 5 felony and something far less serious, and it is where these cases are won.
We handle unlawful sale or purchase of children cases across Maricopa County and statewide, from our Scottsdale and Phoenix offices. Call 623-321-4699 any time, or read the statute in full above before you speak to anyone about the case.
Awards & Recognition
Our recognition for Phoenix criminal defense defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:
- National Trial Lawyers Top 100
- National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40
- Elite Lawyer 2026 – Criminal Defense
- Super Lawyers – Southwest
- National College for DUI Defense (NCDD)
When you are looking for the best Phoenix criminal defense lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.
What Clients Say About Tamou Law
Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is A.R.S. § 13-3625?
A.R.S. § 13-3625 is the Arizona statute on unlawful sale or purchase of children. A violation is a class 5 felony, and which class applies depends on the paragraph charged and the facts the State can prove.
Is a violation of § 13-3625 a felony in Arizona?
Yes. Under the statute a violation is a class 5 felony, so the exposure reaches up to 2.5 years in prison. The paragraph charged and the facts decide which class applies.
What is the sentence for a class 5 felony in Arizona?
For a first felony conviction that is not dangerous or repetitive, A.R.S. 13-702(D) sets a class 5 felony at 6 months to 2.5 years, with a presumptive term of 1.5 years. Dangerous, repetitive and dangerous-crimes-against-children sentencing under 13-703, 13-704 and 13-705 runs longer.
Where can I read the official text of § 13-3625?
The Arizona Legislature publishes it at azleg.gov, in the revision dated 09/19/25. The complete text is reproduced on this page, and every Arizona criminal statute is searchable on our Arizona Criminal Code index.
Two Arizona Offices, One Team
We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.
Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.






