Charged With a Crime or Arrested? Get the Defense You Deserve.
Tamou Law Group PLLC is an award-winning Phoenix criminal defense and DUI law firm. If you’re searching for a Phoenix criminal lawyer you can trust, you need a team that has handled these cases from both sides, whether you’re facing a serious felony or need a Phoenix DUI attorney after an arrest. We provide aggressive, around-the-clock representation to clients throughout Phoenix, Scottsdale, and across Arizona.
Recognized & Award-Winning
Founding attorney Michael Tamou has earned some of the profession’s most respected honors, click any to verify:
- Top 40 Under 40 – National Trial Lawyers
- The National Top 100 Trial Lawyers
- Super Lawyers 2025
- DUI Defense Lawyers Association (DUIDLA)
- National College for DUI Defense (NCDD)
- Elite Lawyers 2025
As a full-service criminal law firm with offices in Phoenix and Scottsdale, we tailor an aggressive defense to each client, from the most serious felony charges to DUI. Whether you’re in the pre-arrest stage or preparing for trial, Tamou Law supports you every step of the way.
Criminal & DUI Cases We Handle in Phoenix
What Clients Say About Tamou Law
Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.
Recent Case Wins
State of Arizona vs. D.O.
The State relied on rapid, stressful eyewitness observations and limited video angles. Defense counsel challenged identification reliability, pressed for complete discovery,…
State of Arizona vs. N.K.
Count 1: Possession of Narcotic Drugs (A.R.S. § 13-3408)
Count 2: Possession of Drug Paraphernalia (A.R.S. § 13-3415)
The case began with a traffic stop where the search and “possession” assumptions were disputed. Counsel scrutinized the stop/search sequence, demanded lab/chain-of-custody…
State of Arizona vs. J.H.
Count 1: Burglary in the Second Degree (A.R.S. § 13-1507)
Count 2: Criminal Damage (A.R.S. § 13-1602)
Count 3: Theft (A.R.S. § 13-1802)
The State alleged intent at entry and tied additional allegations to a messy scene and conflicting witness accounts. The defense attacked the “intent” element, highlighted…
State of Arizona vs. P.A.
Police responded to a dispute with multiple people speaking at once. Counsel compared the 911 call to later statements, reviewed body-cam footage, and highlighted…
State of Arizona vs. E.K.
Count 1: Misconduct Involving Weapons (A.R.S. § 13-3102)
Count 2: Disorderly Conduct (A.R.S. § 13-2904)
The allegation centered on a weapon-related claim during a tense encounter. Defense counsel challenged the State’s assumptions about possession and circumstances, pressed…
State of Arizona vs. L.H.
Count 1: Fraudulent Schemes and Artifices (A.R.S. § 13-2310)
Count 2: Forgery (A.R.S. § 13-2002)
Count 3: Taking the Identity of Another Person (A.R.S. § 13-2008)
Count 4: Theft (A.R.S. § 13-1802)
The State’s theory relied on broad inferences from documents and transaction summaries. Counsel organized records, challenged intent and attribution, and pushed for proof of…
State of Arizona vs. R.M.
The State alleged “force” was used, but the timeline and witness descriptions shifted over time. Defense counsel attacked identification, pressed for complete video, and…
State of Arizona vs. S.Q.
Count 1: Shoplifting (A.R.S. § 13-1805)
Count 2: Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree (A.R.S. § 13-1502)
The case came from a retail incident with disputed intent and incomplete context at checkout. Counsel reviewed store video, receipts, and employee notes, then negotiated a…
State of Arizona vs. T.J.
Count 1: Unlawful Use of Means of Transportation (A.R.S. § 13-1803)
Count 2: Theft (A.R.S. § 13-1802)
Police alleged unlawful vehicle use, but the story included shared access and mixed communications. Counsel documented permission issues, challenged “knowledge” assumptions,…
State of Arizona vs. V.D.
Count 1: Trafficking in Stolen Property (A.R.S. § 13-2307)
Count 2: Theft (A.R.S. § 13-1802)
Count 3: Forgery (A.R.S. § 13-2002)
The State alleged “knowledge” and intent based on summaries rather than direct proof. Counsel challenged the chain of evidence, pressed for foundational records, and…
State of Arizona vs. K.P.
Count 1: Harassment (A.R.S. § 13-2921)
Count 2: Threatening or Intimidating (A.R.S. § 13-1202)
The allegation involved communications during a breakup where context mattered. Counsel provided fuller message threads, challenged intent, and negotiated a resolution…
State of Arizona vs. B.Z.
The State alleged a “course of conduct,” but the timeline relied on selective screenshots. Counsel demanded full records, highlighted mutual contact, and challenged the…
State of Arizona vs. H.S.
Count 1: Burglary in the Third Degree (A.R.S. § 13-1506)
Count 2: Possession of Burglary Tools (A.R.S. § 13-1505)
The State relied on circumstantial inferences about intent and labeled ordinary tools as criminal. Counsel challenged the leap from possession to intent and pressed for…
State of Arizona vs. Q.L.
Count 1: Criminal Trespass in the First Degree (A.R.S. § 13-1504)
Count 2: Interference with Judicial Proceedings (A.R.S. § 13-2810)
The case grew out of a relationship conflict with allegations tied to entry and compliance issues. Counsel reconstructed the timeline from messages and records, highlighted…
State of Arizona vs. D.O.
The State relied on rapid, stressful eyewitness observations and limited video angles. Defense counsel challenged identification reliability, pressed for complete discovery,…
State of Arizona vs. N.K.
Count 1: Possession of Narcotic Drugs (A.R.S. § 13-3408)
Count 2: Possession of Drug Paraphernalia (A.R.S. § 13-3415)
The case began with a traffic stop where the search and “possession” assumptions were disputed. Counsel scrutinized the stop/search sequence, demanded lab/chain-of-custody…
State of Arizona vs. J.H.
Count 1: Burglary in the Second Degree (A.R.S. § 13-1507)
Count 2: Criminal Damage (A.R.S. § 13-1602)
Count 3: Theft (A.R.S. § 13-1802)
The State alleged intent at entry and tied additional allegations to a messy scene and conflicting witness accounts. The defense attacked the “intent” element, highlighted…
State of Arizona vs. P.A.
Police responded to a dispute with multiple people speaking at once. Counsel compared the 911 call to later statements, reviewed body-cam footage, and highlighted…
State of Arizona vs. E.K.
Count 1: Misconduct Involving Weapons (A.R.S. § 13-3102)
Count 2: Disorderly Conduct (A.R.S. § 13-2904)
The allegation centered on a weapon-related claim during a tense encounter. Defense counsel challenged the State’s assumptions about possession and circumstances, pressed…
State of Arizona vs. L.H.
Count 1: Fraudulent Schemes and Artifices (A.R.S. § 13-2310)
Count 2: Forgery (A.R.S. § 13-2002)
Count 3: Taking the Identity of Another Person (A.R.S. § 13-2008)
Count 4: Theft (A.R.S. § 13-1802)
The State’s theory relied on broad inferences from documents and transaction summaries. Counsel organized records, challenged intent and attribution, and pushed for proof of…
State of Arizona vs. R.M.
The State alleged “force” was used, but the timeline and witness descriptions shifted over time. Defense counsel attacked identification, pressed for complete video, and…
State of Arizona vs. S.Q.
Count 1: Shoplifting (A.R.S. § 13-1805)
Count 2: Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree (A.R.S. § 13-1502)
The case came from a retail incident with disputed intent and incomplete context at checkout. Counsel reviewed store video, receipts, and employee notes, then negotiated a…
State of Arizona vs. T.J.
Count 1: Unlawful Use of Means of Transportation (A.R.S. § 13-1803)
Count 2: Theft (A.R.S. § 13-1802)
Police alleged unlawful vehicle use, but the story included shared access and mixed communications. Counsel documented permission issues, challenged “knowledge” assumptions,…
State of Arizona vs. V.D.
Count 1: Trafficking in Stolen Property (A.R.S. § 13-2307)
Count 2: Theft (A.R.S. § 13-1802)
Count 3: Forgery (A.R.S. § 13-2002)
The State alleged “knowledge” and intent based on summaries rather than direct proof. Counsel challenged the chain of evidence, pressed for foundational records, and…
State of Arizona vs. K.P.
Count 1: Harassment (A.R.S. § 13-2921)
Count 2: Threatening or Intimidating (A.R.S. § 13-1202)
The allegation involved communications during a breakup where context mattered. Counsel provided fuller message threads, challenged intent, and negotiated a resolution…
State of Arizona vs. B.Z.
The State alleged a “course of conduct,” but the timeline relied on selective screenshots. Counsel demanded full records, highlighted mutual contact, and challenged the…
State of Arizona vs. H.S.
Count 1: Burglary in the Third Degree (A.R.S. § 13-1506)
Count 2: Possession of Burglary Tools (A.R.S. § 13-1505)
The State relied on circumstantial inferences about intent and labeled ordinary tools as criminal. Counsel challenged the leap from possession to intent and pressed for…
State of Arizona vs. Q.L.
Count 1: Criminal Trespass in the First Degree (A.R.S. § 13-1504)
Count 2: Interference with Judicial Proceedings (A.R.S. § 13-2810)
The case grew out of a relationship conflict with allegations tied to entry and compliance issues. Counsel reconstructed the timeline from messages and records, highlighted…
Unrivaled Experience & Commitment to Your Defense
Do the Math on Real Experience
Experience isn’t about counting years, it’s about hands-on volume. That immersion made Michael intimately familiar with the judges, prosecutors, and officers on these cases, a real edge for his clients.
Proven Experience
Michael Tamou’s track record isn’t just measured in years, it’s measured in cases. He handled nearly 500 cases a year at the public defender’s office, versus the 50–60 many attorneys manage, giving him deep, hands-on command of Arizona criminal law.
Diverse Case Expertise
From lower-level misdemeanors to high-profile drug and felony cases, Michael has defended the full spectrum of criminal charges, so whatever you’re facing, it’s something he has handled before.
Impressive Success
A track record of over 1,000 individual case wins, and that number reflects his own efforts, not a combined firm total.
A Full Team, Not Associates
Your defense is handled by a full team of experienced attorneys, not junior associates, led by founding attorney Michael Tamou. You get the depth of an entire firm, and the experience you deserve, with no bait-and-switch.
Comprehensive Legal Support
For premier defense in Arizona, turn to Michael Tamou and the Tamou Law Group. We offer a free consultation and, in emergencies, 24-hour emergency service.
Former Prosecutors & Law Enforcement
Our team includes former prosecutors and law enforcement officers, so we know exactly how the State builds a case, and where it breaks down. That insider view, paired with Michael's defense record, gives our clients a real edge.
What To Do If Arrested Or Charged in Phoenix
Stay Silent After An Arrest
Invoke your right to remain silent. Do not talk to police or investigators without an attorney present. Anything you say can be used against you.Protect yourself.
Request A Lawyer Immediately
After you invoke your right to remain silent, demand to speak with your lawyer. Police must stop questioning you once you ask for a lawyer. This is important so that an effective advocate can begin protecting your rights.
Avoid Making Uninformed Decisions
Do not accept any deal or sign any documents presented by police. Do not consent to searches, answer invasive questions or waive any rights before talking to your criminal defense lawyer. A quick decision can hurt your case.
Be Respectful During Police Interactions
While you do have to assert your rights, still be calm and respectful towards the officers. Do not argue, resist, or become belligerent. Unnecessary confrontation might get additional charges imposed, such as disorderly conduct or resisting arrest. Stay cool.
Follow Your Lawyer’s Advice & Attend Court Hearings
Once you hire us, follow all advice from your lawyer. You will risk getting a warrant for your arrest or a default judgment against you if you fail to appear or do not follow through on what’s required. Your full cooperation is key.
Possible Criminal Offense Penalties in Arizona
Probation & Supervision
Probation means time on supervision instead of being in jail, with strict requirements such as drug testing, classes, and regular check-ins with a probation officer.
Jail Or Prison Sentences
Depending on the crime, you are either facing time in a Maricopa County jail for misdemeanors or state prison for felonies, which has life-altering consequences and stigma.
Fines & Financial Penalties
Convictions can include thousands of dollars in fines, surcharges and court costs which is a long term financial burden you must pay.
Loss Of Civil Rights
A felony conviction can take away your right to vote, own firearms and may prevent you from getting certain professional licenses or future employment.
Driver’s License Suspension
Offenses like DUI or serious traffic violations will get your license suspended or revoked and limit your mobility and daily life.
Restitution & Compensation
If your crime caused financial damage you will be ordered to pay restitution to the victims. We will verify these amounts and make sure you are not overcharged.
Community Service Requirements
Courts will require you to do hours of community service for non-profit organizations which is a condition of many sentences and plea agreements.
Why Choose Tamou Law Group?
We Focus On What We Do Best – Criminal Defense Representation
Unlike general practice firms, we dedicate 100% of our time and experience to criminal defense. This focus ensures you get the specialized, top-notch advocacy your freedom deserves.
Our Foundational Experience in Criminal Law
Michael Tamou founded this firm on years of experience and trial knowledge which means consistent results for clients facing serious criminal charges in Arizona courts.
Advice Tailored to Your Unique Situation
We know no two cases are the same. Our defense is tailored to the facts of your arrest so we can fight for you personally.
We Provide Relentless Representation
Aggressively challenging each and every piece of evidence, we fight tenaciously from arrest through trial to ensure that the prosecution must prove a case beyond all doubt.
Our Clients Are Our Top Priority
We are committed to minimizing your stress during this, the most trying of times, through constant communication, transparent answers, and relentless support in protecting your future and reputation.
Award Winning Defense
As Seen On
Visit Our Phoenix & Scottsdale Criminal Defense Offices
What Former Clients Say About Us
Phoenix Office
2390 E Camelback Rd Suite 130,
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Scottsdale Office
9375 E Shea Blvd Suite 100,
Scottsdale, AZ 85260
Phoenix Criminal Defense FAQs
Quick answers to the questions we hear most from people facing criminal and DUI charges across Phoenix and Maricopa County.
How much does a criminal defense lawyer cost in Phoenix?
Most Phoenix criminal defense lawyers charge a flat fee that depends on the charge, roughly $1,500–$3,500 for a misdemeanor and $5,000 or more for a felony, based on complexity and whether it goes to trial. Tamou Law Group gives you clear, upfront pricing and a free consultation. Call 623-321-4699.
Do I need a lawyer for a criminal charge in Arizona?
Yes. Arizona prosecutors pursue convictions aggressively, and even a misdemeanor can bring jail, fines, and a permanent record. A defense lawyer protects your rights, challenges the evidence, and often gets charges reduced or dismissed. You should never face a charge, or talk to police, without one.
What should I do if I am arrested in Phoenix?
Stay calm and do not resist, then invoke your right to remain silent, do not answer questions or try to explain, and do not consent to any search. Ask for a lawyer immediately and say nothing else. Call Tamou Law Group at 623-321-4699, available 24/7.
Should I talk to the police before I get a lawyer?
No. Anything you say can be used against you, and officers are trained to draw out admissions even from innocent people. Politely say you are invoking your right to remain silent and want a lawyer, then stop talking. Let your attorney handle all communication with police.
Can a criminal charge be dismissed in Arizona?
Yes, and it happens often. Charges are dismissed when evidence came from an illegal stop or search, the State cannot prove an element, a key witness is unreliable, or the case qualifies for a diversion program. Early, aggressive defense is what creates those outcomes.
What is the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony in Arizona?
A misdemeanor (classes 1–3) carries up to six months in jail and a lasting record, while a felony (classes 1–6) can mean prison, loss of gun and voting rights, and lifelong consequences. Many felonies can be fought down to misdemeanors with the right defense.
Will a first offense stay on my record in Arizona?
Not necessarily. First-time offenders often qualify for diversion or a plea that avoids a conviction, and Arizona now lets many convictions be sealed under A.R.S. 13-911. The goal is to keep the offense off your record so it does not follow you to jobs and housing.
How long does a criminal case take in Maricopa County?
A misdemeanor usually resolves in one to four months, while a felony can take six months to over a year depending on complexity and whether it goes to trial. We move quickly where speed helps you and never rush a case that needs to be fought.
Does Tamou Law Group offer a free consultation?
Yes. We offer a free, confidential consultation and 24-hour emergency service for arrests. We will review your charges, explain your options, and give you a clear plan with no obligation. Call or text 623-321-4699 anytime, day or night.
What areas does Tamou Law Group serve?
We defend clients throughout Phoenix, Scottsdale, and greater Maricopa County, and across Arizona, with offices at 2390 E Camelback Rd in Phoenix and 9375 E Shea Blvd in Scottsdale. We appear in Maricopa County Superior Court and every Valley municipal and justice court.
Can a criminal record be sealed or expunged in Arizona?
Arizona does not fully “expunge” most records, but a 2023 law (A.R.S. 13-911) now lets many convictions be sealed from public view, and A.R.S. 13-905 allows a conviction to be set aside. That can keep an old charge from showing up on background checks. We can review your eligibility.
Can the police search me or my car without a warrant in Arizona?
Only in limited situations, with valid consent, probable cause, or a recognized exception. If police searched you, your car, or your phone without a warrant or real justification, that evidence can be suppressed and the case can fall apart. Never consent to a search, and let your lawyer challenge it.
What is a plea deal, and should I accept one?
A plea deal is an agreement to plead guilty, usually to a reduced charge, in exchange for a lighter sentence. Some are excellent, others give away a winnable case. Never accept one without a lawyer reviewing the evidence, because a good defense often produces a far better offer, or a dismissal.
How do I choose the best criminal defense lawyer in Phoenix?
Look for a firm that focuses on criminal and DUI defense, has strong verified reviews and real case results, is available 24/7, and gives you honest, direct answers, not pressure. Tamou Law Group is award-winning, rated 5.0 on Google, and offers a free consultation. Call 623-321-4699.
Read Our Blog & Learn More About Our Criminal Defense Attorneys
Being charged with a crime can be a life-altering event, and having the right legal representation is crucial. Our experienced criminal defense attorneys at Tamou Law Group are dedicated to providing aggressive defense strategies tailored to your unique situation. Whether you’re facing charges related to assault, theft, drug offenses, or more, we have the expertise to fight for your rights.
When Is Bail Too High in Arizona?
Arizona Criminal & DUI Defense GuideWhen Is Bail Too High in Arizona?Call or Text 623-321-4699Free & confidential…
Continue ReadingCan My Confession Be Thrown Out in Arizona?
Arizona Criminal & DUI Defense GuideCan My Confession Be Thrown Out in Arizona?Call or Text 623-321-4699Free &…
Continue Reading






