Call Us
Contact Us
Text Us
Call or Text Today 623-321-4699

ARS 13-4304: Property Subject to Forfeiture

ARS 13-4304: Property Subject to Forfeiture

Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Criminal Defense

5.0 · Criminal Defense

The complete text of A.R.S. § 13-4304 on property subject to forfeiture, and how this section is used in Arizona criminal cases. It defines terms and procedure rather than creating an offense.

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal Defense2025 Super Lawyers SouthwestNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association
Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Criminal Defense

★★★★★ 5.0 · Criminal Defense

Written and legally reviewed by Michael Tamou, Founding Attorney of Tamou Law Group, PLLC. Last updated September 4, 2026.

As Seen On

As Seen On NBC News, USA Today, Digital Journal, AZ Central, Lamar, ABC News, Fox News

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal DefenseNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association2025 Super Lawyers Southwest

What § 13-4304 Sets Out

A.R.S. § 13-4304 is the Arizona statute on property subject to forfeiture. It sets out procedure and rules rather than defining an offense, so no offense class or sentence attaches to this section on its own.

A. Except as provided in subsections B, C and D of this section, all property, including all interests in such property, described in a statute providing for its forfeiture is subject to forfeiture if both of the following apply:

  1. The owner is convicted of an offense to which forfeiture applies.
  2. The state establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the property is subject to forfeiture as provided in subsection E of this section.

Full Text of A.R.S. § 13-4304

A. Except as provided in subsections B, C and D of this section, all property, including all interests in such property, described in a statute providing for its forfeiture is subject to forfeiture if both of the following apply:

1. The owner is convicted of an offense to which forfeiture applies.

2. The state establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the property is subject to forfeiture as provided in subsection E of this section.

B. A vehicle used by any person as a common carrier in the transaction of business as a common carrier may not be forfeited under this chapter unless the state proves by clear and convincing evidence that the owner or other person in charge of the vehicle was a consenting party or privy to the act or omission giving rise to forfeiture or knew of it.

C. A vehicle may not be forfeited under this chapter following a conviction for any act or for an omission committed or omitted by a person other than the owner while the vehicle was unlawfully in the possession of a person other than the owner in violation of the criminal laws of this state or of the United States.

D. Property may not be forfeited pursuant to section 13-3413, subsection A, paragraph 1 or 3 if the conduct giving rise to the seizure both:

1. Did not involve an amount of unlawful substance greater than the statutory threshold amount as defined in section 13-3401.

2. Was not committed for financial gain.

E. After a person is convicted of an offense for which forfeiture applies, a court may order the person to forfeit any of the following:

1. Property the person acquired through the commission of the offense.

2. Property that is directly traceable to property acquired through the commission of the offense.

3. Any property or instrumentality that the person used in the commission of the offense or to facilitate the offense.

4. Substitute assets as prescribed in section 13-2314, subsection D, paragraph 6, subdivision (d) and in accordance with section 13-4305, subsection C.

F. The court may waive the conviction requirement if the prosecuting authority shows by clear and convincing evidence that there is no known owner of the seized property, diligent efforts have been made to identify the owner of the seized property and no person has asserted an ownership interest in the seized property or that, before conviction, the defendant or alleged criminal:

1. Died.

2. No longer resides in the United States or was deported.

3. Was granted immunity or reduced punishment in exchange for testifying or assisting a law enforcement investigation or prosecution.

4. Fled the jurisdiction of this state.

5. Abandoned the property.

G. This section does not prevent property from being forfeited by the terms of a plea agreement that is approved by a court or by other agreement of the parties in a criminal proceeding.

H. A person who claims to be an innocent owner has the burden of production to show that the person either:

1. Held a legal right, title or interest in the property seized at the time the illegal conduct that gave rise to the seizure of the property occurred.

2. Acquired as a bona fide purchaser for value a legal right, title or interest in the property subject to forfeiture after the commission of the crime that gave rise to the seizure of the property.

I. If a person establishes that the person is an innocent owner pursuant to subsection H of this section and the state pursues a forfeiture proceeding with respect to that person’s property, other than property described in section 13-3413 to successfully forfeit the property, the state shall prove by clear and convincing evidence that the innocent owner had actual knowledge of the underlying crime that gave rise to the forfeiture.

J. If the state is unable to prove the person is not an innocent owner as provided in subsections H and I of this section, the court shall find that the person is an innocent owner and order the state to relinquish all claims of title to the property and return the property to the innocent owner.

Source: Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-4304, Arizona Legislative Council revision of 09/19/25. Read the official text on azleg.gov. Statutes change; verify the current version before relying on it.

Related Guides From Our Team

Written by our defense team on how these cases run in Arizona courts.

How § 13-4304 Affects an Arizona Case

§ 13-4304 usually matters because of how it interacts with the charge someone is actually facing. We read it alongside the charging statute, because a definition or a procedural rule frequently decides what the State must prove, what a judge may impose, or what relief is available afterward.

Call 623-321-4699 for a confidential consultation, 24/7.

Awards & Recognition

Our recognition for Phoenix criminal defense defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:

When you are looking for the best Phoenix criminal defense lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.

Client Reviews

What Clients Say About Tamou Law

Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.

5.0
Google Rating
1,000+
Cases Won
100%
Criminal Defense
24/7
Availability
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is A.R.S. § 13-4304?

A.R.S. § 13-4304 is the Arizona statute on property subject to forfeiture. It sets out rules that apply across Arizona criminal cases rather than defining a single offense.

Where can I read the official text of § 13-4304?

The Arizona Legislature publishes it at azleg.gov, in the revision dated 09/19/25. The complete text is reproduced on this page, and every Arizona criminal statute is searchable on our Arizona Criminal Code index.

Visit Us

Two Arizona Offices, One Team

We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.

Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.