The client was accused of armed robbery following an alleged incident involving the theft of shoes and the display of a firearm. After scrutinizing the evidence and challenging the testimony of the victim, a Diversion program was proposed. In Arizona, successful completion of the Diversion program results in the dismissal of charges against the defendant.
Tamou Law Group - Case Results
State of Arizona vs. D.O.
Charge:
Count 1: Armed Robbery with a Deadly Weapon
Result: Diversion
State of Arizona vs. D.O.
Charge:
Count 1: Armed Robbery with a Deadly Weapon
The client was accused of armed robbery following an alleged incident involving the theft of shoes and the display of a firearm. After scrutinizing the evidence and challenging the testimony of the victim, a Diversion program was proposed. In Arizona, successful completion of the Diversion program results in the dismissal of charges against the defendant.
Result: Diversion
State of Arizona vs. N.K.
Charges:
Count 1: Possession of Narcotic Drugs (Fentanyl)
Count 2: Possession of Dangerous Drugs (Cocaine)
Count 3: Possession of Narcotic Drugs (Heroin)
Count 4: Possession of Dangerous Drugs (Xanax)
Count 5: Possession of Dangerous Drugs (Methamphetamine)
Count 6: Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
The client was stopped by law enforcement for speeding, and during the encounter, officers noticed drug paraphernalia in plain sight. A subsequent search uncovered fentanyl, cocaine, heroin, and Xanax. Following several discussions and thorough verification of facts, the client was presented with the option of participating in a Diversion program.
Result: Diversion
State of Arizona vs. N.K.
Charges:
Count 1: Possession of Narcotic Drugs (Fentanyl)
Count 2: Possession of Dangerous Drugs (Cocaine)
Count 3: Possession of Narcotic Drugs (Heroin)
Count 4: Possession of Dangerous Drugs (Xanax)
Count 5: Possession of Dangerous Drugs (Methamphetamine)
Count 6: Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
The client was stopped by law enforcement for speeding, and during the encounter, officers noticed drug paraphernalia in plain sight. A subsequent search uncovered fentanyl, cocaine, heroin, and Xanax. Following several discussions and thorough verification of facts, the client was presented with the option of participating in a Diversion program.
Result: Diversion
State of Arizona vs. J.H.
Charges:
Count 1: Possession of Narcotic Drugs
Count2: Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
The client was stopped by the police, and during the encounter, officers noticed an unlabeled medicine bottle in plain sight. The client claimed it did not belong to them. After engaging in negotiations with the State, presenting deviation and mitigation arguments, the State ultimately decided to dismiss the charges against the client with prejudice.
Result: Case Dismissed
State of Arizona vs. J.H.
Charges:
Count 1: Possession of Narcotic Drugs
Count2: Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
The client was stopped by the police, and during the encounter, officers noticed an unlabeled medicine bottle in plain sight. The client claimed it did not belong to them. After engaging in negotiations with the State, presenting deviation and mitigation arguments, the State ultimately decided to dismiss the charges against the client with prejudice.
Result: Case Dismissed
State of Arizona vs. P.A.
Charges:
Count 1: Burglary
Count2: Trespassing
First Plea Offer: 4.5 Years in Prison
The client had a history of four previous felonies, including an aggravated assault categorized as dangerous. The initial plea offer involved a 4.5-year prison sentence. However, after thoroughly examining the case, its facts, and presenting mitigating factors, the client was offered a 12-month deferred jail sentence. This meant that the client would not have to serve jail time unless they violated probation, and the court had the option to remove the jail sentence altogether.
Result: 12 Months Deferred Jail
State of Arizona vs. P.A.
Charges:
Count 1: Burglary
Count2: Trespassing
First Plea Offer: 4.5 Years in Prison
The client had a history of four previous felonies, including an aggravated assault categorized as dangerous. The initial plea offer involved a 4.5-year prison sentence. However, after thoroughly examining the case, its facts, and presenting mitigating factors, the client was offered a 12-month deferred jail sentence. This meant that the client would not have to serve jail time unless they violated probation, and the court had the option to remove the jail sentence altogether.
Result: 12 Months Deferred Jail
State of Arizona vs. A.S.
Charges:
Count 1: Unlawful Flight from Law Enforcement
Count 2: Possession of Narcotic Drugs
Count 3: Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Following the client’s failure to stop for the police, which resulted in a pursuit, they were apprehended and subsequently searched. Fentanyl was discovered during the search. After engaging in talks with the State, the client was offered a Diversion program.
Result: Diversion
State of Arizona vs. A.S.
Charges:
Count 1: Unlawful Flight from Law Enforcement
Count 2: Possession of Narcotic Drugs
Count 3: Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Following the client’s failure to stop for the police, which resulted in a pursuit, they were apprehended and subsequently searched. Fentanyl was discovered during the search. After engaging in talks with the State, the client was offered a Diversion program.
Result: Diversion
State of Arizona vs. E.K.
Charges:
Count 1: Misconduct Involving Weapons
Count 2: Disorderly Conduct – Domestic Violence
Client was involved with in a dispute with a woman he had a short-term relationship with. The victim allegedly was threatened with a weapon by the client. After discovery and conversations that took place were brought to surface, victim recanted her recollection of the events removing credibility towards the original charges. Client was then given an opportunity at Diversion for purposes of the disorderly conduct charge which was changed then to a noise complaint.
Result: Diversion
State of Arizona vs. E.K.
Charges:
Count 1: Misconduct Involving Weapons
Count 2: Disorderly Conduct – Domestic Violence
Client was involved with in a dispute with a woman he had a short-term relationship with. The victim allegedly was threatened with a weapon by the client. After discovery and conversations that took place were brought to surface, victim recanted her recollection of the events removing credibility towards the original charges. Client was then given an opportunity at Diversion for purposes of the disorderly conduct charge which was changed then to a noise complaint.
Result: Diversion
State of Arizona vs. L.H.
Multiple Cases:
Case 1: Possession of Dangerous Drugs + Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Case 2: Possession of Narcotic Drugs + Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Case 3: Driving Under the Influence
Case 4: Possession of Dangerous Drugs + Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Case 5: Possession of Narcotic Drugs + Possession of Dangerous Drugs + Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Case 6: Possession of Dangerous Drugs + Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Case 7: Possession of Narcotic Drugs
Client was brough on charges on several matters all at once. At one point, she was held non-bondable. A defendant can be held non-bondable when they commit a felony on felony release meaning the Judge has allowed you to be free as you deal with your case. We were able to stipulate to a bond and work on her matters while we continuously attacked each case until we achieved an offer that our client was happy with. With the plea entered, the client would be able to turn all of the class 6 undesignated felonies for possession of drug paraphernalia into misdemeanors upon successful discharge of probation.
Result: Cases 4,5,6,7 Dismissed
Pled Guilty to Possession of Drug Paraphernalia in Cases 1, 2, 3, with possibility to turn all charges into Misdemeanors after successful probation discharge.
State of Arizona vs. L.H.
Multiple Cases:
Case 1: Possession of Dangerous Drugs + Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Case 2: Possession of Narcotic Drugs + Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Case 3: Driving Under the Influence
Case 4: Possession of Dangerous Drugs + Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Case 5: Possession of Narcotic Drugs + Possession of Dangerous Drugs + Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Case 6: Possession of Dangerous Drugs + Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Case 7: Possession of Narcotic Drugs
Client was brought on charges on several matters all at once. At one point, she was held non-bondable. A defendant can be held non-bondable when they commit a felony on felony release meaning the Judge has allowed you to be free as you deal with your case. We were able to stipulate to a bond and work on her matters while we continuously attacked each case until we achieved an offer that our client was happy with. With the plea entered, the client would be able to turn all of the class 6 undesignated felonies for possession of drug paraphernalia into misdemeanors upon successful discharge of probation.