Below are some of the most common strategies we employ, though we emphasize that each case may require a different approach or combination of approaches:

1. Challenging the Legality of the Search and Seizure: This involves questioning the methods used by law enforcement to obtain the weapon. If they violated your constitutional rights, we could potentially have the evidence excluded from the case.
2. Disputing Constructive Possession: If the weapon was not found directly on your person, we could argue that you were not in possession of it. Constructive possession requires that you had knowledge and control over the weapon, which might not always be straightforward to prove.
3. Questioning the Status of the Weapon: Not all objects qualify as ‘deadly weapons’ under the law. We might be able to argue that the object in question does not meet this standard.
4. Arguing Lack of Intent: If the prosecution cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you intended to use the weapon unlawfully, this could form a key part of your defense.
5. Presenting Mitigating Circumstances: Circumstances like self-defense, defense of others, or necessity can sometimes serve to mitigate the charges. We carefully examine the context of your case to see if such defenses apply.
6. Challenging the ‘Prohibited Possessor’ Status: We can question the validity of the prohibited possessor status if you were charged based on being a felon in possession of a weapon.

Our long-standing history of successfully handling hundreds of misconduct involving weapons charges has provided us with the extensive experience and knowledge necessary to build a robust defense. We review every aspect of the case, from the arrest to the collection of evidence, to identify any potential violations or weaknesses in the prosecution’s claims.