ARS 13-2915: Preventing use of telephone in emergency
The complete text of A.R.S. § 13-2915 on preventing use of telephone in emergency, what the State has to prove, and the sentencing range, with a violation charged as a class 2 misdemeanor and exposure reaching up to 4 months in jail.
Recognized By
As Seen On
Recognized By
What the State Must Prove Under § 13-2915
A.R.S. § 13-2915 is the Arizona statute on preventing use of telephone in emergency. The statute sets out 3 ways the offense can be committed. A violation is a class 2 misdemeanor, depending on the paragraph charged and what the State can prove. The maximum exposure is 4 months in jail.
A. It is unlawful for a person to do any of the following:
- Knowingly refuse to yield or surrender the use of a party line to another person to report a fire or summon police or medical or other aid in case of emergency.
- Ask for or request the use of a party line on the pretext that an emergency exists, knowing that no emergency in fact exists.
- Intentionally prevent or interfere with the use of a telephone by another person in an emergency situation.
The State must prove every element of the paragraph it actually charged, beyond a reasonable doubt. Which paragraph appears on the complaint decides what the case is about, and it is the first thing to check.
Penalties for a § 13-2915 Conviction
| Class | Maximum jail | Maximum fine |
|---|---|---|
| Class 2 misdemeanor | 4 months | $750 |
Felony ranges are set by A.R.S. § 13-702(D) and apply to a first felony conviction that is not dangerous and not repetitive. A dangerous offense (§ 13-704), a repetitive offense (§ 13-703) or a dangerous crime against children (§ 13-705) carries a longer range, and some carry mandatory prison with no probation. Misdemeanor maximums come from §§ 13-707 and 13-802; surcharges are added on top of every fine.
Full Text of A.R.S. § 13-2915
A. It is unlawful for a person to do any of the following:
1. Knowingly refuse to yield or surrender the use of a party line to another person to report a fire or summon police or medical or other aid in case of emergency.
2. Ask for or request the use of a party line on the pretext that an emergency exists, knowing that no emergency in fact exists.
3. Intentionally prevent or interfere with the use of a telephone by another person in an emergency situation.
B. Every telephone directory that is compiled and distributed to subscribers shall contain a notice explaining this section. The notice shall be printed in type that is no smaller than any other type on the same page, other than headings, and shall be preceded by the word “warning”. This subsection does not apply to directories that are distributed solely for business advertising purposes, commonly known as classified directories.
C. This section does not require a person to allow another person to enter the person’s home or place of residence for the purpose of using a telephone in an emergency situation.
D. A person who violates this section is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor.
E. For the purposes of this section:
1. “Emergency” means a situation in which property or human life is in jeopardy and the prompt summoning of aid is essential.
2. “Emergency situation” means a situation in which both of the following apply:
(a) Human health, life or safety is in jeopardy and the prompt summoning of aid is essential.
(b) It is reasonable to believe that a domestic violence offense pursuant to section 13-3601 is being, has been or is about to be committed.
3. “Party line” means a subscriber’s line telephone circuit, consisting of two or more main telephone stations connected therewith, each station with a distinctive ring or telephone number.
Source: Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-2915, Arizona Legislative Council revision of 09/19/25. Read the official text on azleg.gov. Statutes change; verify the current version before relying on it.
Our Guides on This Charge
Written by our defense team on how these cases run in Arizona courts.
Related Statutes in Chapter 29 — Offenses Against Public Order
- A.R.S. § 13-2914 — Aggressive solicitation
- A.R.S. § 13-2916 — Use of an electronic communication to terrify, intimidate, threaten or harass
- A.R.S. § 13-2913 — Unlawful violation of fire ban
- A.R.S. § 13-2917 — Public nuisance
- A.R.S. § 13-2912 — Unlawful introduction of disease or parasite
- A.R.S. § 13-2918 — Interference with emergency transmission on citizens’ band radio frequency
- A.R.S. § 13-2911 — Interference with or disruption of an educational institution
- A.R.S. § 13-2919 — Automated telephone solicitation
How Tamou Law Group Defends § 13-2915 Cases
A § 13-2915 case is decided by the paragraph the State charged, not by the statute as a whole. We start with the charging document and the disclosure, identify which subsection the prosecutor has to prove, and test whether the evidence actually reaches every element of it. Where the class turns on a fact such as value, an alleged injury, a prior conviction or the identity of the person involved, that fact is frequently the difference between a class 2 misdemeanor and something far less serious, and it is where these cases are won.
We handle preventing use of telephone in emergency cases across Maricopa County and statewide, from our Scottsdale and Phoenix offices. Call 623-321-4699 any time, or read the statute in full above before you speak to anyone about the case.
Awards & Recognition
Our recognition for Phoenix sex crime defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:
- National Trial Lawyers Top 100
- National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40
- Elite Lawyer 2026 – Criminal Defense
- Super Lawyers – Southwest
- National College for DUI Defense (NCDD)
When you are looking for the best Phoenix sex crime lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.
What Clients Say About Tamou Law
Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is A.R.S. § 13-2915?
A.R.S. § 13-2915 is the Arizona statute on preventing use of telephone in emergency. A violation is a class 2 misdemeanor, and which class applies depends on the paragraph charged and the facts the State can prove.
Is a violation of § 13-2915 a felony in Arizona?
No. Under the statute a violation is a class 2 misdemeanor, so the exposure reaches up to 4 months in jail. The paragraph charged and the facts decide which class applies.
What is the maximum penalty for a class 2 misdemeanor?
A.R.S. 13-707 caps jail at 4 months for a class 2 misdemeanor and A.R.S. 13-802 caps the fine at $750, before surcharges. A judge may also impose probation and other conditions.
Where can I read the official text of § 13-2915?
The Arizona Legislature publishes it at azleg.gov, in the revision dated 09/19/25. The complete text is reproduced on this page, and every Arizona criminal statute is searchable on our Arizona Criminal Code index.
Two Arizona Offices, One Team
We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.
Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.