Entrapment Defense in Arizona: How It Works
Convinced the police set you up in a sting or an undercover operation? Entrapment is a real defense under A.R.S. § 13-206, but it is narrow: you must admit you committed the offense and prove it by clear and convincing evidence. Never raise it on your own; let an attorney vet the facts first.
Recognized By
As Seen On
Recognized By
Featured Answer
What is entrapment in Arizona?
Entrapment in Arizona is an affirmative defense that applies when law enforcement, not you, originated the idea for a crime and induced you to commit it while you were not predisposed to do so. You must admit the offense and prove entrapment by clear and convincing evidence.
Almost everyone who calls about entrapment has the same instinct: the police set me up, so the case should go away. In Arizona, the truth is more demanding. Entrapment is a real, statutory defense, but it is narrow, it is one of the few defenses that forces you to admit you committed the crime, and it puts the burden on you rather than the prosecutor. Understanding that trade before you say a word can be the difference between a defense that wins and one that hands the State a conviction. This guide explains the actual rule, where the line falls between a legal sting and true entrapment, and how a defense attorney decides whether the argument is worth making at all. For a broader look at how we build a defense, see our Arizona criminal defense overview.
Entrapment in Arizona is defined by A.R.S. 13-206, and the statute is short but strict. It says entrapment is an affirmative defense, which means it is not the State’s job to disprove it. Instead, the defendant carries the burden and must prove entrapment by clear and convincing evidence, a higher standard than the everyday preponderance standard used in most civil disputes.
The core idea is that the government cannot manufacture a crime by planting the idea in the mind of an innocent person and then arrest them for it. But the statute draws a hard boundary around that idea. It expressly states that it is not entrapment merely because law enforcement gave you an opportunity to commit the offense, used a ruse, or hid the officer’s identity. A sting operation, standing alone, is legal. Entrapment starts only where the government crosses from offering an opportunity to actively creating the criminal intent.
The three-part test in plain English
Under A.R.S. 13-206, to win an entrapment defense you must prove all three of the following by clear and convincing evidence. Miss any one and the defense fails.
- The idea started with the government. The plan to commit the offense must have originated with law enforcement officers or their agents, such as a confidential informant, rather than with you. If the idea was yours first, there is no entrapment.
- They urged and induced you. The officers or their agents must have actively urged and induced you to commit the crime. Simply making the offense available to you is not inducement. There has to be persuasion, pressure, or some form of active encouragement that moved you to act.
- You were not predisposed. You must show you were not predisposed to commit that type of offense before the government urged you. Predisposition means a preexisting willingness or readiness to break the law, and it is almost always the fight that decides the case.
Read together, these elements describe a specific story: an otherwise unwilling person who was talked into a crime by the government. That is very different from a willing person who simply got caught taking an opportunity the police provided.
The catch: you have to admit the crime
Here is the part that surprises people and the reason entrapment is never a casual argument. A.R.S. 13-206 requires that, to raise entrapment, the defendant admits by their testimony or other evidence the substantial elements of the offense charged. In plain terms, you cannot tell the jury “I didn’t do it, but if I did, I was entrapped.” To even get the defense, you must concede that you committed the act.
That makes entrapment an all-in strategy. You give up the ability to argue you are not guilty of the conduct, and you stake the entire case on proving the government created the crime. If the jury does not buy the entrapment argument, you have already admitted the offense, and a conviction becomes very likely. This is why the decision to raise entrapment is one of the most consequential calls in the whole case and should never be made without a clear-eyed attorney evaluation.
A legal sting versus true inducement
The whole defense lives on one line: the difference between the government affording you an opportunity, which is legal, and the government inducing you, which can be entrapment. Arizona law is clear that a sting is not automatically entrapment. Undercover work, decoys, and controlled buys are standard, court-approved police tactics. What matters is what the agents did once contact was made.
On the legal side of the line, an undercover officer who simply offers to sell drugs, or who poses as a buyer and waits to see if you will sell, is giving you an opportunity. If you take it, that is your choice and your predisposition showing. On the entrapment side of the line, an agent who repeatedly badgers a reluctant person, exploits sympathy or friendship, promises outsized rewards, or wears down someone who kept saying no has moved into inducement. The conduct, the pressure, and your resistance are what separate the two.
Opportunity vs inducement: where the line falls
Framework based on A.R.S. 13-206. These are illustrative patterns defense attorneys commonly see, not guarantees about any specific case.
Outcomes turn on the specific facts and evidence. This chart illustrates the analysis, not a promise of any result.
Concrete examples of how this plays out
Entrapment questions show up most often in a handful of Arizona case types, and the examples make the rule easier to see.
Undercover drug buys
Drug stings are the classic setting. An undercover officer arranges a buy, and the seller is charged under statutes like A.R.S. 13-3407 for sale or transportation of dangerous drugs. Just selling to an undercover buyer is not entrapment. But if an informant spent weeks pressuring a person with no history of dealing, playing on a hardship, and finally coaxed a single sale, the inducement and lack of predisposition can be real. Our Phoenix drug crime defense team sees both versions regularly.
Online solicitation and prostitution stings
Internet decoy operations are another common flashpoint. Officers pose as someone online, and a person who initiates and escalates the conversation is usually not entrapped, because the intent came from them. The analysis changes if the decoy pushed the topic first and pressed a hesitant person. These fact patterns come up constantly in online solicitation and prostitution charges, where who steered the conversation is often the whole ballgame.
Why predisposition usually decides these cases
In practice, the first two elements often blur together, and the case turns on predisposition: were you already willing to commit this kind of crime before the government got involved? Because entrapment protects the innocent person who was talked into it, prosecutors focus their entire attack on showing you were ready and willing all along.
Defense attorneys commonly see the State try to prove predisposition with things like prior similar conduct, how quickly and eagerly you responded, your familiarity with the criminal activity, whether you set the price or supplied the tools, and any statements suggesting you had done it before. If you jumped at the first offer, that reads as predisposition. If you refused repeatedly and only relented under sustained pressure, that reads as inducement of an unwilling person. This is why the details of the interaction, every message and every recorded word, matter so much. The evidence that police gathered to prove the crime is often the same evidence that shows how hard they had to push.
When entrapment is worth raising and when it backfires
Because raising entrapment means conceding the act, it is only worth doing when the inducement evidence is genuinely strong. It tends to be worth serious consideration when there is a documented pattern of the government pushing, when you have a clean history that supports a lack of predisposition, when an informant used friendship, romance, money, or sympathy to overcome your refusals, and when the record shows you said no more than once.
It backfires when the evidence shows you were a willing participant. If you initiated contact, negotiated readily, brought your own supply, or have prior conduct of the same kind, admitting the offense to argue entrapment simply gift-wraps the case for the prosecutor. In those situations a better path is often to attack the State’s proof directly, challenge the stop or search, or scrutinize how the operation was run. How officers built their case, and whether they had lawful grounds, ties into issues like probable cause versus reasonable suspicion in Arizona. The right move depends entirely on the facts, which is exactly why this is an attorney’s judgment call, not a do-it-yourself decision.
How a Maricopa County defense attorney evaluates it
When a potential entrapment case comes in, a defense attorney does not start with the label; they start with the record. The first step is pulling everything that captures the interaction: recorded calls and texts, undercover reports, informant communications, body-worn and surveillance footage, and the full timeline of contacts. Those materials answer the two questions that decide the defense: whose idea was it, and how much pushing did it take?
From there, the analysis is honest about the trade-off. An attorney weighs the strength of the inducement evidence against the cost of admitting the offense, tests how a Maricopa County jury is likely to see your history and your responses, and compares entrapment against every other available defense. Sometimes the best answer is a full entrapment defense at trial. Often it is using weak inducement evidence, or a badly run operation, as leverage in negotiation rather than as an all-or-nothing admission. The goal is never to raise entrapment for its own sake. It is to choose the path that actually gives you the best chance at the best outcome.
Award-Winning Criminal Defense Law Firm
When you are looking for the best Phoenix sex crime lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors.
Client reviews
What our clients say
I highly recommend Michael Tamou! He recently handled my GCE application, and I couldn't be more grateful for his help. From the very beginning, Michael was incredibly professional, knowledgeable, and thorough in making sure everything was completed perfectly. What stood out the most was his compassion—legal processes can be highly stressful, but he treated me with genuine care, kept me informed, and made me feel completely supported throughout. If you need a dedicated and skilled attorney who truly cares about his clients, look no further than Michael Tamou.
DMDan MillerGoogle review · Oct 2026Michael Tamou is an exceptional attorney! Facing a case that could affect my future was incredibly stressful, but from our first conversation, he provided honest guidance, reassurance, and a clear plan. He immediately got to work, personally reviewing the evidence and reports, filing the necessary motions, and keeping me informed throughout the process. His expertise, persistence, and genuine care gave me confidence that my case was in capable hands. I’m incredibly grateful that Michael achieved the outcome I had hoped and prayed for: my case was dismissed. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a skilled, dedicated, and caring attorney.
TJTammy JohnsonGoogle review · Sep 2026I had a great experience working with Michael. From the beginning, they were professional, knowledgeable, and responsive. They took the time to explain everything clearly, kept me informed throughout the process, and always had my best interests in mind. Their dedication and attention to detail gave me confidence during a stressful time, and they achieved a positive outcome for my case. I truly appreciate their hard work and would highly recommend them to anyone looking for an experienced and trustworthy attorney. Thank so much Tamou Law Group.
AAAlejandra ArevaloGoogle review · Aug 2026This is a great group of attorneys that work together!! There’s no other law firm I’d use for any situation. They put the time and effort into helping out any way they can. Mike and Kristie were both amazing in handling my situation and being transparent during the whole process.
TTJ2KGoogle review · Nov 2026I can’t thank Tamou Law Group enough for helping me with my case. They truly went above and beyond, and I’m incredibly grateful for their hard work, dedication, and support. Having a team in your corner that cares makes all the difference during a stressful time. Five stars don’t feel like enough! I highly recommend them to anyone looking for a law firm that will go the extra mile. Thank you for everything!
EGEvan GibraelGoogle review · Oct 2026I cannot recommend Ms. Jacie Cotterell highly enough. From start to finish, she was absolutely amazing throughout the entire process. She was professional, knowledgeable, and always took the time to answer my questions and explain everything clearly, which gave me a lot of peace of mind during a stressful situation. What stood out most was how genuinely caring and dedicated she was. I always felt like she had my best interests at heart, and her communication was excellent every step of the way. She made a difficult experience much easier to navigate and was always patient, supportive, and reassuring. I am incredibly grateful for all of her hard work and guidance. If you’re looking for someone who is compassionate, trustworthy, and truly committed to helping her clients, I wholeheartedly recommend Ms. Jacie Cotterell. Thank you again for everything, wyou made a lasting positive impact, and I truly appreciate all that you did.
BPBlaze PeralesGoogle review · Aug 2026Michael is hands down the best in the business. The day I called him he explained everything about my daughter’s situation and took the time to research the charges. He then gave me a price and gave me a chance to think it through before hiring him and two weeks later we retained his services. Michael went to work at that point with his team and brought results that no one else could do. My daughter now has a second chance to get her life on track over a few costly mistakes that could have landed her in prison and with a felony record but Michael did not allow that to happen. If you need solid representation that fights for you then hire Michael.
RHrob hardeeGoogle review · Aug 2026Kristie & Mike didn’t just see me as another client but as a person in need of help. The level of professionalism & communication going through my whole case made me feel at peace. Amazing lawyers & 10/10 would recommend!
DNDanny NguyenGoogle review · Oct 2026We {Carrie & Ted S.} are very pleased that we chose Mike Tamou Law Group to represent a criminal case that was against our granddaughter. The case against her was for two different ordeals, and in both situations - the cases were handled above & beyond what we expected. Because of Mike's quickness and professionalism, both situations were resolved in an expedited manor with positive results that we were extremely pleased with. Our granddaughter is also extremely pleased with the results. We would recommend {Mike} Tamou Law Group to anybody that is seeking legal advice in a criminal situation.
TSTed SchroederGoogle review · Jul 2026I had an aggravated DUI case class 4 felony. With an extensive criminal record of 7 prior felonies. Mr. Tamou did an outstanding job on my case, he got me the least possible amount of time. He got the prosecutor not to allege any of my priers. I did just 4 months with a probation tail. Other lawyers I spoke with prior to retaining M. Tamou, told me the best they could get, would be a few years in prison, due to my extensive criminal history. Michael said he would fight for me and he delivered. He has relationships with the prosecutors and judges and is a great negotiator. Also he was great with communicating with me throughout the process. Always returned my calls and text messages and kept me informed. I highly recommend him.
PGPaul GonzalezGoogle review · May 2026I had a great experience with Tamou Law! Michael was very helpful. He took the time to explain everything in a way that was easy for me to understand, which made the entire process feel much less overwhelming. He was patient, professional, and always made sure I felt informed and comfortable with each step. I truly appreciated his communication and support throughout! HIGHLY RECOMMEND!
SSandraGoogle review · Apr 2026Michael is truly amazing. I am so happy that I chose him to help me with my legal situation. He is completely trustworthy. Michael was completely transparent and honest throughout the entire process and offered support to me like I was his own family member. He was patient and understanding and prompt in responding to any of my inquiries during my waiting period. His explanations were clear and logical, and I felt beyond comfortable with him. I really appreciate him and the staff in his practice, and I highly recommend him for anyone's legal needs!! Thank you, Michael! You're really the best. I appreciate you!
RLRochelle LeeGoogle review · Feb 2026Our family went through the worst time of our lives! It was wonderful to have Michael on our side fighting for us and giving us the advice we needed to take the right steps. Case Dismissed! Thank you for your hard work, dedication, and support.
RERussell EllisGoogle review · Aug 2026He's the Greatest lawyer we could have ever asked for he put his heart into helping us and we came out with exactly what we wanted! I highly recommend him!
JOJose OrtizGoogle review · Oct 2026⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ I cannot thank Mike Tamou enough for what he did for my family. My son was facing serious charges that could have changed the course of his life forever. From the very beginning, Mr. Tamou treated us with compassion, respect, and honesty. He took the time to explain every step of the process, always making sure we understood what was happening and what to expect. His professionalism and dedication were unmatched. He worked tirelessly on my son’s case, exploring every possible option and fighting for the best outcome. Because of Mike’s skill, expertise, and determination, my son was saved from going to jail and now has the opportunity to move forward and rebuild his life. I am forever grateful for his hard work and would highly recommend Mike Tamou to anyone in need of a strong, knowledgeable, and caring defense attorney. He doesn’t just represent his clients—he truly fight for them.
EHErin HernandezGoogle review · 2025Michael did an amazing job helping my loved one with his case. He was the first call I made and I knew right then how much he truly cared for his clients. I highly recommend Tamou Law to anyone who reads this review. Michael worked extremely hard for us and exceeded my expectations of the outcome. He is compassionate, very knowledgeable, experienced, respected and very fair. He always took the time to take my calls and to listen to questions that we had. He works hard for his clients and is the kind of guy you want on your side. Thanks again Michael. You were a pleasure to work with.
LBLaurie BryantGoogle review · 2024Great experience from start to finish. Professional, responsive, and made a stressful situation much easier. I felt confident the whole time and really appreciated Michael’s support. Highly recommend!
SMShivraj MannGoogle review · Apr 2026Had a situation that Michael helped me through with the best possible outcome. Very responsive and actually cares about his clients.
CJCaleb JohnsonGoogle review · Aug 2026My son was an idiot and was in serious trouble. He was facing prison time. Fortunately, we were referred to Tamou Law Group by trusted friends and we are beyond grateful that we listened. From the onset, Michael helped to put our family at ease. We discussed the charges where Mike provided insight that helped adjust our expectations. Sure enough, it played out nearly exactly like Mike predicted. Mike put a strong case together – which resulted with no jail time! If you find yourself in need of legal representation, you should hire Michael Timou!
AHArmando HernandezGoogle review · 2025I can’t recommend Tamou law group enough. From day one, Micheal took the time to really listen, explained my options in a way that actually made sense, and built a strong strategy that put my mind at ease. The entire team was professional, responsive and genuinely caring throughout the whole process. They fought tirelessly and delivered a result that far exceeded my expectations. If you need a law firm you can trust completely, this is it. Thank you!
BKBryan KingGoogle review · Dec 2025
Why Tamou Law Group for Criminal Defense
Every criminal case in Arizona is decided by what the State can prove, and the State proves less when the defense starts early. We get into cases before charges are filed whenever we can, and we build them on evidence rather than argument.
Results across the spectrum
Our published results include armed robbery and sexual assault cases dismissed, reckless driving dismissed, diversion on drug and theft charges, probation with no jail on aggravated DUI, and a second-degree murder charge reduced. Every case is different, and these show how we fight.
Former prosecutors and law enforcement officers
Our team includes former prosecutors and law enforcement officers, so we know how the State builds a case and where it breaks down. Michael Tamou handled roughly 500 cases a year at the public defender’s office before founding the firm.
Recognized, and available
Michael Tamou is recognized by the National Trial Lawyers Top 100 and Top 40 Under 40, Super Lawyers Southwest and Elite Lawyer 2026. We answer 24/7 from our Phoenix and Scottsdale offices, and we appear in Maricopa, Pima and Pinal County courts.
Published results in this area
| Case | Charges | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| State v. D.O. | Armed robbery and aggravated assault (A.R.S. 13-1904, 13-1204) | Dismissed |
| State v. W.N. | Sexual assault and sexual abuse (13-1406, 13-1404) | Case dismissed |
| State v. C.K. | Reckless driving and racing (28-693, 28-708) | Case dismissed |
| State v. N.K. | Possession of narcotic drugs (13-3408, 13-3415) | Diversion |
| State v. L.S. | Aggravated DUI (28-1383) | Probation, no jail |
| State v. F.N. | Second-degree murder (13-1104) | Reduced charge |
Anonymized outcomes from our case results page. Every case is different; past results do not guarantee a future outcome.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is entrapment in simple terms?
Entrapment is when law enforcement plants the idea for a crime in the mind of someone who was not already willing to commit it, then pressures that person into doing it, and finally arrests them. In Arizona it is a defense the accused person must prove, not something the State disproves.
Is a police sting operation the same as entrapment?
No. A.R.S. 13-206 states that merely giving someone an opportunity to commit a crime, using a ruse, or concealing an officer’s identity is not entrapment. Undercover stings are legal. Entrapment only arises if agents actively urged and induced a person who was not predisposed to break the law.
Who has to prove entrapment in Arizona?
The defendant does. Entrapment is an affirmative defense, so the accused person must prove it by clear and convincing evidence. That is a higher bar than the preponderance standard used in civil cases, though lower than the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard the State must meet to prove guilt.
Do I have to admit the crime to argue entrapment?
Yes. Arizona law requires you to admit the substantial elements of the offense through your testimony or other evidence before you can claim entrapment. You cannot both deny the act and argue entrapment, which makes it an all-in strategy that should only be used when the inducement evidence is strong.
Can you give an example of entrapment?
An informant befriends a person with no drug history, spends weeks exploiting a hardship, and repeatedly begs for a one-time favor until the reluctant person finally makes a single sale. The idea came from the government, the person was pressured, and there was no prior willingness. That pattern can support entrapment.
What is predisposition and why does it matter?
Predisposition is a person’s preexisting willingness to commit the type of crime charged before police got involved. It matters because entrapment fails if you were already willing. Prosecutors prove predisposition with things like prior conduct, eager participation, or setting the terms of the deal yourself.
Is entrapment a common defense in drug cases?
Entrapment questions come up often in drug and solicitation stings because those cases use undercover officers and informants. But it succeeds only in a minority of them, because most defendants took an offered opportunity. It works best where the record shows sustained government pressure on an unwilling person.
What happens if the entrapment defense fails at trial?
Because you already admitted committing the offense to raise entrapment, a failed defense usually leaves you facing conviction on that admission. There is typically no fallback to arguing the State did not prove the act. That risk is exactly why the decision requires careful evaluation with an attorney first.
Can I claim entrapment if an informant, not a police officer, set me up?
Yes. A.R.S. 13-206 covers law enforcement officers and their agents, which includes confidential informants working for the police. If an informant originated the idea and induced you while you were not predisposed, that can support entrapment just as an undercover officer’s conduct would.
Should I tell the police I was entrapped?
No. Because entrapment requires admitting the crime, telling officers you were entrapped can hand them a confession without securing any defense. Say nothing about the facts, ask for a lawyer, and let an attorney evaluate whether the evidence actually supports an entrapment argument before you commit to it.
Two Arizona Offices, One Team
We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.
Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
