Call Us
Contact Us
Text Us
Call or Text Today 623-321-4699

ARS 13-1808: Presumptions relating to issuing a bad check

ARS 13-1808: Presumptions relating to issuing a bad check

Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Criminal Defense

5.0 · Criminal Defense

The complete text of A.R.S. § 13-1808 on presumptions relating to issuing a bad check, and how this section is used in Arizona criminal cases. It defines terms and procedure rather than creating an offense.

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal Defense2025 Super Lawyers SouthwestNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association
Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Criminal Defense

★★★★★ 5.0 · Criminal Defense

Written and legally reviewed by Michael Tamou, Founding Attorney of Tamou Law Group, PLLC. Last updated September 4, 2026.

As Seen On

As Seen On NBC News, USA Today, Digital Journal, AZ Central, Lamar, ABC News, Fox News

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal DefenseNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association2025 Super Lawyers Southwest

What § 13-1808 Sets Out

A.R.S. § 13-1808 is the Arizona statute on presumptions relating to issuing a bad check. It sets out procedure and rules rather than defining an offense, so no offense class or sentence attaches to this section on its own.

A. For the purposes of this chapter, the issuer’s knowledge of insufficient funds may be presumed if either:

  1. The issuer had no account or a closed account with the bank or other drawee at the time the issuer issued the check.
  2. Payment was refused by the bank or other drawee for lack of funds on presentation within thirty days after issue and the issuer failed to pay the holder in full the amount due on the check, together with reasonable costs, within twelve days after receiving notice of that refusal.

Full Text of A.R.S. § 13-1808

A. For the purposes of this chapter, the issuer’s knowledge of insufficient funds may be presumed if either:

1. The issuer had no account or a closed account with the bank or other drawee at the time the issuer issued the check.

2. Payment was refused by the bank or other drawee for lack of funds on presentation within thirty days after issue and the issuer failed to pay the holder in full the amount due on the check, together with reasonable costs, within twelve days after receiving notice of that refusal.

B. If a person obtained property or secured performance of services by issuing or passing a check when the issuer did not have sufficient funds in or on deposit with the bank or other drawee for the payment in full of the check as well as all other checks then outstanding, the person’s intent to deprive the owner of property or to avoid payment for service under section 13-1802 may be presumed if either:

1. The issuer had no account or a closed account with the bank or other drawee at the time the issuer issued the check.

2. Payment was refused by the bank or other drawee for lack of funds on presentation within thirty days after issue and the issuer failed to pay the holder in full the amount due on the check, together with reasonable costs, within twelve days after receiving notice of that refusal.

C. Nothing in this section prevents the prosecution from establishing the requisite intent by direct evidence.

D. Notice may be actual notice or notice in writing that is sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or by regular mail that is supported by an affidavit of service by mailing. Written notice shall be addressed to the issuer at the issuer’s address shown on any of the following:

1. The check.

2. The records of the bank or other drawee.

3. The records of the person to whom the check is issued or passed.

E. The form of notice shall be substantially as follows:

Notice of dishonored check

Date:___________________________________________

Name of issuer:_________________________________

Street address:_________________________________

City and state:_________________________________

You are, according to law, hereby notified that a check or instrument numbered ________, dated ________, 19________, drawn on ______________________ in the amount of ____________________

(bank or other drawee)

and payable to ___________________________ has been dishonored.

Pursuant to Arizona law, you have twelve days from receipt of this notice to pay or tender to_________________ the full amount

(holder)

of the check or instrument, together with all reasonable costs and protest fees of ___________, the total amount due being __________________. Unless this amount is paid in full within the specified time above, the holder of the check or instrument may turn over the dishonored check or instrument and all other available information relating to this incident to the county attorney for criminal prosecution.

F. If written notice is given in accordance with this section, it is presumed that the notice was received no later than five days after it was sent.

Source: Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-1808, Arizona Legislative Council revision of 09/19/25. Read the official text on azleg.gov. Statutes change; verify the current version before relying on it.

How § 13-1808 Affects an Arizona Case

§ 13-1808 usually matters because of how it interacts with the charge someone is actually facing. We read it alongside the charging statute, because a definition or a procedural rule frequently decides what the State must prove, what a judge may impose, or what relief is available afterward.

Call 623-321-4699 for a confidential consultation, 24/7.

Awards & Recognition

Our recognition for Phoenix criminal defense defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:

When you are looking for the best Phoenix criminal defense lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.

Client Reviews

What Clients Say About Tamou Law

Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.

5.0
Google Rating
1,000+
Cases Won
100%
Criminal Defense
24/7
Availability
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is A.R.S. § 13-1808?

A.R.S. § 13-1808 is the Arizona statute on presumptions relating to issuing a bad check. It sets out rules that apply across Arizona criminal cases rather than defining a single offense.

Where can I read the official text of § 13-1808?

The Arizona Legislature publishes it at azleg.gov, in the revision dated 09/19/25. The complete text is reproduced on this page, and every Arizona criminal statute is searchable on our Arizona Criminal Code index.

Visit Us

Two Arizona Offices, One Team

We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.

Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.