ARS 13-3556: Permissible inferences
The complete text of A.R.S. § 13-3556 on permissible inferences, and how this section is used in Arizona criminal cases. It defines terms and procedure rather than creating an offense.
Recognized By
As Seen On
Recognized By
Full Text of A.R.S. § 13-3556
A.R.S. § 13-3556 is the Arizona statute on permissible inferences. It sets out procedure and rules rather than defining an offense, so no offense class or sentence attaches to this section on its own.
In a prosecution relating to the sexual exploitation of children, the trier of fact may draw the inference that a participant is a minor if the visual depiction or live act through its title, text or visual representation depicts the participant as a minor.
Source: Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-3556, Arizona Legislative Council revision of 09/19/25. Read the official text on azleg.gov. Statutes change; verify the current version before relying on it.
Related Statutes in Chapter 35.1 — Sexual Exploitation Of Children
- A.R.S. § 13-3555 — Portraying adult as minor
- A.R.S. § 13-3554 — Luring a minor for sexual exploitation
- A.R.S. § 13-3558 — Admitting minors to public displays of sexual conduct
- A.R.S. § 13-3553 — Sexual exploitation of a minor
- A.R.S. § 13-3552 — Commercial sexual exploitation of a minor
- A.R.S. § 13-3560 — Aggravated luring a minor for sexual exploitation
- A.R.S. § 13-3561 — Unlawful age misrepresentation
How § 13-3556 Affects an Arizona Case
§ 13-3556 usually matters because of how it interacts with the charge someone is actually facing. We read it alongside the charging statute, because a definition or a procedural rule frequently decides what the State must prove, what a judge may impose, or what relief is available afterward.
Call 623-321-4699 for a confidential consultation, 24/7.
Awards & Recognition
Our recognition for Phoenix sex crime defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:
- National Trial Lawyers Top 100
- National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40
- Elite Lawyer 2026 – Criminal Defense
- Super Lawyers – Southwest
- National College for DUI Defense (NCDD)
When you are looking for the best Phoenix sex crime lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.
What Clients Say About Tamou Law
Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is A.R.S. § 13-3556?
A.R.S. § 13-3556 is the Arizona statute on permissible inferences. It sets out rules that apply across Arizona criminal cases rather than defining a single offense.
Where can I read the official text of § 13-3556?
The Arizona Legislature publishes it at azleg.gov, in the revision dated 09/19/25. The complete text is reproduced on this page, and every Arizona criminal statute is searchable on our Arizona Criminal Code index.
Two Arizona Offices, One Team
We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.
Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.