ARS 13-3993: Defendant by qualified experts
The complete text of A.R.S. § 13-3993 on defendant by qualified experts, and how this section is used in Arizona criminal cases. It defines terms and procedure rather than creating an offense.
As Seen On
Recognized By
What § 13-3993 Sets Out
A.R.S. § 13-3993 is the Arizona statute on defendant by qualified experts. It sets out procedure and rules rather than defining an offense, so no offense class or sentence attaches to this section on its own.
A. On request of the court or any party, with the consent of the defendant and after a determination that a reasonable basis exists to support the guilty except insane defense, the court shall appoint a qualified expert to evaluate the defendant and provide a written report that includes:
- The mental status of the defendant at the time of the alleged offense.
- If the qualified expert determines that the defendant suffered from a mental disease or defect at the time of the alleged offense, the relationship of the mental disease or defect to the alleged offense.
Full Text of A.R.S. § 13-3993
A. On request of the court or any party, with the consent of the defendant and after a determination that a reasonable basis exists to support the guilty except insane defense, the court shall appoint a qualified expert to evaluate the defendant and provide a written report that includes:
1. The mental status of the defendant at the time of the alleged offense.
2. If the qualified expert determines that the defendant suffered from a mental disease or defect at the time of the alleged offense, the relationship of the mental disease or defect to the alleged offense.
B. Within ten days after appointment of the qualified expert, the parties shall provide all available medical records, mental health reports and criminal history records to the qualified expert. On notice to the court, the qualified expert may request additional records from the parties.
C. If the defendant provides a notice of a guilty except insane defense, the defense attorney shall nominate its own qualified expert to examine the defendant to determine the defendant’s mental status at the time of the alleged offense. The state may call the same number of medical doctors and licensed psychologists who will testify on behalf of the defense.
D. If a defendant refuses to be examined by the state’s qualified experts, the court shall preclude the defendant from offering expert evidence of the defendant’s mental status at the time of the alleged offense.
E. The privilege of confidential communications between a qualified expert and the defendant as it relates to the defendant’s mental status at the time of the alleged crime does not apply if any mental disability defense is raised.
F. If any mental disability defense is raised, both the state and the defendant shall receive before the trial complete copies of any report by a qualified expert who examines the defendant.
G. After a plea of guilty or after disposition of a matter where the defendant has pleaded guilty except insane, the court shall order all of the reports submitted pursuant to section 13-502 and this article sealed. The court may order that the reports be opened only as follows:
1. For use by the court or defendant, or by the prosecutor if otherwise allowed by law, for further competency or sanity evaluations or in a hearing to determine whether the defendant is eligible for court-ordered treatment pursuant to title 36, chapter 5 or is a sexually violent person.
2. For statistical analysis.
3. When the records are deemed necessary to assist in mental health treatment pursuant to section 13-502 or 13-4517.
4. For use by the probation department or by the state department of corrections if the defendant is in the custody of or is scheduled to be transferred into the custody of the state department of corrections to assess and supervise or monitor the defendant by that department.
5. For use by a mental health treatment provider that provides treatment to the defendant or that assesses the defendant for treatment.
6. For data gathering.
7. For scientific study.
H. Any statement that is made by the defendant during an examination that is conducted pursuant to this article or any evidence resulting from that statement is not subject to disclosure pursuant to section 36-509.
Source: Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-3993, Arizona Legislative Council revision of 09/19/25. Read the official text on azleg.gov. Statutes change; verify the current version before relying on it.
Related Statutes in Chapter 38 — Miscellaneous
- A.R.S. § 13-3981 — Compromise of misdemeanors and petty offenses
- A.R.S. § 13-4006 — Unlawful foreign law enforcement activity
- A.R.S. § 13-3924 — Unlawful procurement of search warrant without probable cause
- A.R.S. § 13-3903 — Notice to appear and complaint
- A.R.S. § 13-3885 — Arrest of principal by surety
- A.R.S. § 13-3864 — Payment of account of agent
- A.R.S. § 13-4145 — Disobedience of command of writ
- A.R.S. § 13-4147 — Avoidance of command of writ
How § 13-3993 Affects an Arizona Case
§ 13-3993 usually matters because of how it interacts with the charge someone is actually facing. We read it alongside the charging statute, because a definition or a procedural rule frequently decides what the State must prove, what a judge may impose, or what relief is available afterward.
Call 623-321-4699 for a confidential consultation, 24/7.
Awards & Recognition
Our recognition for Phoenix sex crime defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:
- National Trial Lawyers Top 100
- National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40
- Elite Lawyer 2026 – Criminal Defense
- Super Lawyers – Southwest
- National College for DUI Defense (NCDD)
When you are looking for the best Phoenix sex crime lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.
What Clients Say About Tamou Law
Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is A.R.S. § 13-3993?
A.R.S. § 13-3993 is the Arizona statute on defendant by qualified experts. It sets out rules that apply across Arizona criminal cases rather than defining a single offense.
Where can I read the official text of § 13-3993?
The Arizona Legislature publishes it at azleg.gov, in the revision dated 09/19/25. The complete text is reproduced on this page, and every Arizona criminal statute is searchable on our Arizona Criminal Code index.
Two Arizona Offices, One Team
We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.
Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.






