Call Us
Contact Us
Text Us
Call or Text Today 623-321-4699

ARS 13-4202: Void contracts

ARS 13-4202: Void contracts

Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Criminal Defense

5.0 · Criminal Defense

The complete text of A.R.S. § 13-4202 on void contracts, and how this section is used in Arizona criminal cases. It defines terms and procedure rather than creating an offense.

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal Defense2025 Super Lawyers SouthwestNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association
Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Criminal Defense

★★★★★ 5.0 · Criminal Defense

Written and legally reviewed by Michael Tamou, Founding Attorney of Tamou Law Group, PLLC. Last updated September 4, 2026.

As Seen On

As Seen On NBC News, USA Today, Digital Journal, AZ Central, Lamar, ABC News, Fox News

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal DefenseNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association2025 Super Lawyers Southwest

Full Text of A.R.S. § 13-4202

A.R.S. § 13-4202 is the Arizona statute on void contracts. It sets out procedure and rules rather than defining an offense, so no offense class or sentence attaches to this section on its own.

A. Every contract, whether written or oral, express or implied, with an accused with respect to the reenactment, description or depiction of a crime by movie, book, article, radio or television presentation, internet or on-line presentation or depiction, live entertainment or expression of thoughts, feelings, opinions or emotions is contrary to public policy and void unless the contract provides for payment to the commission of any monies that would be paid to the accused for such information or rights.

B. The commission shall deposit the monies received pursuant to subsection A from the contracts or agreements of each accused, for each crime committed by the accused, in a separate account designated as a crime victim account. The money shall be distributed as determined by the commission to any victim of the crime committed by the accused if both of the following apply:

1. The accused is convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for the crime.

2. The victim, within five years after the date of establishment of the account, applies to the commission for compensation and demonstrates by sufficient reliable evidence, as determined by the commission, that the victim has suffered a loss resulting from such crime and the amount of such loss.

C. The commission, at least once every year for five years from the date of receipt of monies pursuant to subsection B, shall publish a legal notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the crime was committed and in counties contiguous to such county advising all victims for which monies have been received that funds are available to satisfy money judgments pursuant to this section. The notice shall identify the accused, describe the criminal act involved and the proceedings against the accused and state the procedure to be followed for recovery of monies pursuant to subsection B. No reference to the identity of the victim shall be made. The commission, in its discretion, may provide for such additional notice as it deems necessary.

D. On disposition of charges favorable to an accused, the commission shall immediately pay any monies in the account owing to such person.

E. After five years have elapsed following the establishment of the account pursuant to subsection B and on a showing that no applications for compensation are pending pursuant to this section, the commission shall immediately pay any monies in the account to the state general fund.

F. For the purposes of this section, a person who is found guilty except insane pursuant to rule 23.2, Arizona rules of criminal procedure, is deemed to be a convicted person.

G. If it is found, pursuant to rule 11, Arizona rules of criminal procedure, that a person who is accused of a crime is unfit to proceed as a result of a mental illness or defect because the person lacks the capacity to understand the proceedings against the person or to assist in the person’s own defense, the commission shall bring an action of interpleader pursuant to rule 22, Arizona rules of civil procedure, to determine disposition of the escrow account.

H. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the five-year period provided for in subsection B does not begin to run until an account is established.

I. Notwithstanding subsections B through F the commission shall make payments from the account to any accused on the order of a court of competent jurisdiction after a showing by the accused that the money will be used for the sole purpose of retaining legal representation at any stage of the proceedings against the accused.

J. An action taken by any person, whether by execution of a power of attorney, creation of a corporate entity or otherwise, to defeat the purpose of this section shall be null and void as against the public policy of this state.

K. The cost of administering the account and monies in the account shall be reimbursed to the industrial commission from the account.

L. Any person who enters into a contract described in subsection A that does not comply with this section shall be liable to the state for deposit in the crime victim account of an amount equal to all monies paid or received including monies paid to or received by another person by execution of a power of attorney, creation of a corporate entity or otherwise, which execution was done to defeat the purposes of this section.

M. For the purposes of this section, “loss” includes the value of any property damaged, destroyed or taken, the cost of medical treatment or counseling, lost wages and any other damage suffered as a result of the crime.

Source: Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-4202, Arizona Legislative Council revision of 09/19/25. Read the official text on azleg.gov. Statutes change; verify the current version before relying on it.

How § 13-4202 Affects an Arizona Case

§ 13-4202 usually matters because of how it interacts with the charge someone is actually facing. We read it alongside the charging statute, because a definition or a procedural rule frequently decides what the State must prove, what a judge may impose, or what relief is available afterward.

Call 623-321-4699 for a confidential consultation, 24/7.

Awards & Recognition

Our recognition for Phoenix criminal defense defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:

When you are looking for the best Phoenix criminal defense lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.

Client Reviews

What Clients Say About Tamou Law

Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.

5.0
Google Rating
1,000+
Cases Won
100%
Criminal Defense
24/7
Availability
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is A.R.S. § 13-4202?

A.R.S. § 13-4202 is the Arizona statute on void contracts. It sets out rules that apply across Arizona criminal cases rather than defining a single offense.

Where can I read the official text of § 13-4202?

The Arizona Legislature publishes it at azleg.gov, in the revision dated 09/19/25. The complete text is reproduced on this page, and every Arizona criminal statute is searchable on our Arizona Criminal Code index.

Visit Us

Two Arizona Offices, One Team

We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.

Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.