ARS 13-4294: Cell site simulator device search warrant
The complete text of A.R.S. § 13-4294 on cell site simulator device search warrant, and how this section is used in Arizona criminal cases. It defines terms and procedure rather than creating an offense.
As Seen On
Recognized By
Full Text of A.R.S. § 13-4294
A.R.S. § 13-4294 is the Arizona statute on cell site simulator device search warrant. It sets out procedure and rules rather than defining an offense, so no offense class or sentence attaches to this section on its own.
A. A cell site simulator device search warrant may not be issued except on probable cause, supported by affidavit or oath, naming or particularly describing the person using the communications device to be identified. If the magistrate is satisfied that probable cause exists for the issuance of a cell site simulator device search warrant, the magistrate shall issue the search warrant commanding the use of a cell site simulator device.
B. A cell site simulator device search warrant may be issued on the following grounds:
1. When the communications device to be identified is in the possession of a person who has used the communications device, is using the communications device or is about to use the communications device as a means of committing a public offense.
2. When the communications device to be identified constitutes any evidence that tends to show that a particular public offense has been committed or tends to show that a particular person has committed or is committing the public offense.
C. The cell site simulator device search warrant shall authorize use of the cell site simulator device any time of the day or night and shall specify a reasonable length of time that the cell site simulator device may be used that does not exceed sixty days after the date that the search warrant was signed. The court may grant one or more extensions of a cell site simulator device search warrant if an affidavit in support of an extension is made and the court makes the findings required by subsections A and B of this section. The period of each extension may not be longer than the authorizing magistrate deems necessary to achieve the purposes for which the extension was granted and may not exceed sixty days.
D. A cell site simulator device search warrant must be initiated within ten calendar days after the search warrant’s issuance. On the expiration of the ten-day period, the search warrant is void unless the time is extended by a magistrate. An extension may not exceed ten calendar days. The cell site simulator device search warrant must be returned to a magistrate within three court business days after the authorization period of the search warrant expires. The return shall state the time and date that the device was used.
E. Within ninety days after the cell site simulator device’s use ends, a copy of the cell site simulator device search warrant must be served on the person whose communications device was identified. Service of the notice may be accomplished by any of the following methods:
1. Delivering a copy to the person whose communications device was identified at the person’s known place of residence.
2. If the person’s residence is unknown, by mailing a copy to the subscriber of the communications device.
3. Any other method that the court directs.
F. The court may delay the notice of cell site simulator device use that is required by subsection E of this section in the same manner prescribed in section 13-3919, subsection B.
G. A cell site simulator device may not be used to intercept, obtain or access the content of any stored oral, wire or electronic communication unless the interception or access is authorized by chapter 30 of this title. A cell site simulator device may be used to track a communications device pursuant to section 13-4293.
H. If the cell site simulator device is used to locate or track a known communications device, all nontarget data must be destroyed within sixty court business days after the return of the search warrant to a magistrate.
I. If the cell site simulator device is used to identify an unknown communications device, all nontarget data must be destroyed within sixty court business days after the return of the search warrant to a magistrate unless a court orders the nontarget data to be preserved.
Source: Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-4294, Arizona Legislative Council revision of 09/19/25. Read the official text on azleg.gov. Statutes change; verify the current version before relying on it.
Related Statutes in Chapter 38 — Miscellaneous
- A.R.S. § 13-4295.01 — Illegal entry from foreign nation
- A.R.S. § 13-4295.02 — Refusal to comply with order to return to a foreign nation
- A.R.S. § 13-4147 — Avoidance of command of writ
- A.R.S. § 13-4145 — Disobedience of command of writ
- A.R.S. § 13-4006 — Unlawful foreign law enforcement activity
- A.R.S. § 13-3981 — Compromise of misdemeanors and petty offenses
- A.R.S. § 13-3924 — Unlawful procurement of search warrant without probable cause
- A.R.S. § 13-3903 — Notice to appear and complaint
How § 13-4294 Affects an Arizona Case
§ 13-4294 usually matters because of how it interacts with the charge someone is actually facing. We read it alongside the charging statute, because a definition or a procedural rule frequently decides what the State must prove, what a judge may impose, or what relief is available afterward.
Call 623-321-4699 for a confidential consultation, 24/7.
Awards & Recognition
Our recognition for Phoenix criminal defense defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:
- National Trial Lawyers Top 100
- National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40
- Elite Lawyer 2026 – Criminal Defense
- Super Lawyers – Southwest
- National College for DUI Defense (NCDD)
When you are looking for the best Phoenix criminal defense lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.
What Clients Say About Tamou Law
Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is A.R.S. § 13-4294?
A.R.S. § 13-4294 is the Arizona statute on cell site simulator device search warrant. It sets out rules that apply across Arizona criminal cases rather than defining a single offense.
Where can I read the official text of § 13-4294?
The Arizona Legislature publishes it at azleg.gov, in the revision dated 09/19/25. The complete text is reproduced on this page, and every Arizona criminal statute is searchable on our Arizona Criminal Code index.
Two Arizona Offices, One Team
We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.
Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.






