Call Us
Contact Us
Text Us
Call or Text Today 623-321-4699

ARS 13-4309: Postdeprivation hearing

ARS 13-4309: Postdeprivation hearing

Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Criminal Defense

5.0 · Criminal Defense

The complete text of A.R.S. § 13-4309 on postdeprivation hearing, and how this section is used in Arizona criminal cases. It defines terms and procedure rather than creating an offense.

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal Defense2025 Super Lawyers SouthwestNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association
Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Criminal Defense

★★★★★ 5.0 · Criminal Defense

Written and legally reviewed by Michael Tamou, Founding Attorney of Tamou Law Group, PLLC. Last updated September 4, 2026.

As Seen On

As Seen On NBC News, USA Today, Digital Journal, AZ Central, Lamar, ABC News, Fox News

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal DefenseNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association2025 Super Lawyers Southwest

Full Text of A.R.S. § 13-4309

A.R.S. § 13-4309 is the Arizona statute on postdeprivation hearing. It sets out procedure and rules rather than defining an offense, so no offense class or sentence attaches to this section on its own.

A. After the seizure of property, the defendant in the related criminal matter or another person who claims an interest in the seized property, up to sixty days after the notice, may claim an interest in seized property by filing a motion with the superior court requesting an order for the release of the claimed property to the person’s custody pending further forfeiture proceedings and orders pursuant to this chapter. A motion filed pursuant to this section must include facts to support the person’s alleged interest in the property. The state may elect to not contest the motion and the release of the claimed property to the custody of the person who is claiming the interest in the seized property. The state may request that the court issue a protective order that preserves the availability of released property pending further forfeiture proceedings.

B. A person who makes a timely motion for the return of property has a right to a hearing on the motion before the resolution of any related criminal matter or forfeiture proceeding and within thirty days after the date that the motion is filed.

C. At least ten days before a hearing on a motion filed pursuant to this section, the state shall file an answer or responsive motion that includes the reasons why the state is entitled to retain possession of the property.

D. The court shall grant the claimant’s motion if the court finds that any of the following applies:

1. It is likely that the final judgment will require the state to return the property to the claimant.

2. The property is not reasonably required to be held for evidentiary reasons.

3. The property is the only reasonable means for a defendant to pay for legal representation in a related criminal or forfeiture proceeding. This paragraph does not apply if the court finds by sufficient evidence, presented in a hearing on a motion, answer or responsive motion, that another person has filed a claim to the seized property and the other person is the victim, as defined in section 13-4401, of the alleged crime that gave rise to the forfeiture.

E. The court may order the return of money or property sufficient to obtain legal counsel but less than the total amount seized and the court may require an accounting.

F. In lieu of ordering the return of property, the court may order:

1. The state to give security or written assurance for satisfaction of any judgment, including damages, that may be rendered in a related forfeiture action.

2. Any other relief that the court deems to be just.

G. This section does not prevent either of the following:

1. The state from returning any property to the owner of the property.

2. The filing of a racketeering lien pursuant to section 13-2314.02 or a restitution lien pursuant to section 13-806.

Source: Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-4309, Arizona Legislative Council revision of 09/19/25. Read the official text on azleg.gov. Statutes change; verify the current version before relying on it.

Related Guides From Our Team

Written by our defense team on how these cases run in Arizona courts.

How § 13-4309 Affects an Arizona Case

§ 13-4309 usually matters because of how it interacts with the charge someone is actually facing. We read it alongside the charging statute, because a definition or a procedural rule frequently decides what the State must prove, what a judge may impose, or what relief is available afterward.

Call 623-321-4699 for a confidential consultation, 24/7.

Awards & Recognition

Our recognition for Phoenix criminal defense defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:

When you are looking for the best Phoenix criminal defense lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.

Client Reviews

What Clients Say About Tamou Law

Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.

5.0
Google Rating
1,000+
Cases Won
100%
Criminal Defense
24/7
Availability
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is A.R.S. § 13-4309?

A.R.S. § 13-4309 is the Arizona statute on postdeprivation hearing. It sets out rules that apply across Arizona criminal cases rather than defining a single offense.

Where can I read the official text of § 13-4309?

The Arizona Legislature publishes it at azleg.gov, in the revision dated 09/19/25. The complete text is reproduced on this page, and every Arizona criminal statute is searchable on our Arizona Criminal Code index.

Visit Us

Two Arizona Offices, One Team

We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.

Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.