Call Us
Contact Us
Text Us
Call or Text Today 623-321-4699

ARS 13-4512: Competency restoration treatment

ARS 13-4512: Competency restoration treatment

Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Criminal Defense

5.0 · Criminal Defense

The complete text of A.R.S. § 13-4512 on competency restoration treatment, and how this section is used in Arizona criminal cases. It defines terms and procedure rather than creating an offense.

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal Defense2025 Super Lawyers SouthwestNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association
Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Criminal Defense

★★★★★ 5.0 · Criminal Defense

Written and legally reviewed by Michael Tamou, Founding Attorney of Tamou Law Group, PLLC. Last updated September 4, 2026.

As Seen On

As Seen On NBC News, USA Today, Digital Journal, AZ Central, Lamar, ABC News, Fox News

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal DefenseNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association2025 Super Lawyers Southwest

Full Text of A.R.S. § 13-4512

A.R.S. § 13-4512 is the Arizona statute on competency restoration treatment. It sets out procedure and rules rather than defining an offense, so no offense class or sentence attaches to this section on its own.

A. The court may order a defendant to undergo out of custody competency restoration treatment. If the court determines that confinement is necessary for treatment, the court shall commit the defendant for competency restoration treatment to the competency restoration treatment program designated by the county board of supervisors.

B. If the county board of supervisors has not designated a program to provide competency restoration treatment, the court may commit the defendant for competency restoration treatment to the Arizona state hospital, subject to funding appropriated by the legislature to the Arizona state hospital for inpatient competency restoration treatment services, or to any other facility that is approved by the court.

C. A county board of supervisors that has designated a county restoration treatment program may enter into contracts with providers, including the Arizona state hospital, for inpatient, in-custody competency restoration treatment. A county competency restoration treatment program may do the following:

1. Provide competency restoration treatment to a defendant in the county jail, including inpatient treatment.

2. Obtain court orders to transport the defendant to other providers, including the Arizona state hospital, for inpatient, in-custody competency restoration treatment.

D. In determining the type and location of the treatment, the court shall select the least restrictive treatment alternative after considering the following:

1. Whether confinement is necessary for treatment.

2. The likelihood that the defendant is a threat to public safety.

3. The defendant’s participation in and cooperation during an outpatient examination of competency to stand trial conducted pursuant to section 13-4507.

4. The defendant’s willingness to submit to outpatient competency restoration treatment as a condition of pretrial release, if the defendant is eligible for pretrial release.

E. An order entered pursuant to this section shall state whether the defendant is incompetent to refuse treatment, including medication, pursuant to section 13-4511.

F. A defendant shall pay the cost of inpatient, in-custody competency restoration treatment unless otherwise ordered by the court. If the court finds the defendant is unable to pay all or a portion of the costs of inpatient, in-custody treatment, the city, town or county shall pay the costs of inpatient, in-custody competency restoration treatment at the Arizona state hospital that are incurred until:

1. Seven days, excluding Saturdays, Sundays or other legal holidays, after the hospital submits a report to the court stating that the defendant has regained competency or that there is no substantial probability that the defendant will regain competency within twenty-one months after the date of the original finding of incompetency.

2. The treatment order expires.

3. Seven days, excluding Saturdays, Sundays or other legal holidays, after the charges are dismissed.

G. The county, or the city if the competency proceedings arise out of a municipal court proceeding, shall pay the hospital costs that are incurred after the period of time designated in subsection F of this section and shall also pay for the costs of inpatient, in-custody competency restoration treatment in court-approved programs that are not programs at the Arizona state hospital.

H. Payment for the cost of outpatient community treatment is the responsibility of the defendant unless:

1. The defendant is enrolled in a program that covers the treatment and that has funding available for the provision of treatment to the defendant, and the defendant is eligible to receive the treatment. Defendants in these circumstances may be required to share in the cost of the treatment if cost sharing is required by the program in which the defendant is enrolled.

2. The court finds that the defendant is unable to pay all or a portion of treatment costs or that outpatient treatment is not otherwise available to the defendant. For defendants in these circumstances, all or a portion of the costs of outpatient community treatment shall be borne by the county or the city if the competency proceedings arise out of a municipal court proceeding.

I. A treatment order issued pursuant to this section is valid for one hundred eighty days or until one of the following occurs:

1. The treating facility submits a report that the defendant has regained competency or that there is no substantial probability that the defendant will regain competency within twenty-one months after the date of the original finding of incompetency.

2. The charges are dismissed.

3. The maximum sentence for the offense charged has expired.

4. A qualified physician who represents the Arizona state hospital determines that the defendant is not suffering from a mental illness and is competent to stand trial.

J. The Arizona state hospital shall collect census data for adult restoration to competency treatment programs to establish maximum capacity and the allocation formula required pursuant to section 36-206, subsection D. The Arizona state hospital or the department of health services is not required to provide restoration to competency treatment that exceeds the funded capacity. If the Arizona state hospital reaches its funded capacity in either or both the adult male or adult female restoration to competency treatment programs, the superintendent of the state hospital shall establish a waiting list for admission based on the date of the court order issued pursuant to this section.

K. Notwithstanding any other law, a county may meet any statutory funding requirements of this section from any source of county revenue designated by the county, including funds of any countywide special taxing district of which the board of supervisors serves as the board of directors.

Source: Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-4512, Arizona Legislative Council revision of 09/19/25. Read the official text on azleg.gov. Statutes change; verify the current version before relying on it.

How § 13-4512 Affects an Arizona Case

§ 13-4512 usually matters because of how it interacts with the charge someone is actually facing. We read it alongside the charging statute, because a definition or a procedural rule frequently decides what the State must prove, what a judge may impose, or what relief is available afterward.

Call 623-321-4699 for a confidential consultation, 24/7.

Awards & Recognition

Our recognition for Phoenix criminal defense defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:

When you are looking for the best Phoenix criminal defense lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.

Client Reviews

What Clients Say About Tamou Law

Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.

5.0
Google Rating
1,000+
Cases Won
100%
Criminal Defense
24/7
Availability
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is A.R.S. § 13-4512?

A.R.S. § 13-4512 is the Arizona statute on competency restoration treatment. It sets out rules that apply across Arizona criminal cases rather than defining a single offense.

Where can I read the official text of § 13-4512?

The Arizona Legislature publishes it at azleg.gov, in the revision dated 09/19/25. The complete text is reproduced on this page, and every Arizona criminal statute is searchable on our Arizona Criminal Code index.

Visit Us

Two Arizona Offices, One Team

We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.

Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.