Can Police Recover Deleted Files? ARS 13-3553 Forensics
Detectives seized your devices in an Arizona sexual exploitation case? Deleting a file rarely erases it. Under A.R.S. § 13-3553, each image can become its own count — and where the minor is under fifteen, those sentences run consecutively with no probation or parole. Call us before any interview.
Recognized By
As Seen On
Recognized By
Featured Answer
Can Police Recover Deleted Files in an Arizona Case?
Usually, yes. Deleting a file normally erases only the pointer to it, not the underlying data, so examiners can recover deleted files from unallocated space, thumbnail caches, and backups. The harder question is not can police recover deleted files but who knowingly put them there — recovery is not attribution.
If detectives have taken your phone or computer in an Arizona sexual exploitation investigation, you are almost certainly asking one question first: is the stuff I deleted really gone? Usually it is not, and you should plan around that. But the answer people rarely hear matters more: whether a file can be recovered is not what these cases turn on. They turn on whether the state can prove that you, specifically, knowingly possessed it.
A.R.S. § 13-3553 covers a broad range of conduct involving a visual depiction of a minor engaged in exploitive exhibition or other sexual conduct, and it requires the state to prove a knowing mental state. That is the short version — our Arizona sexual exploitation defense page covers the charge in full. This article is about the other half: how digital forensics works, what an examiner’s report can and cannot establish, and where those conclusions are contestable.
In most cases, yes — and you should assume so. On ordinary phones and computers, “delete” almost never means “erase.” The operating system removes the entry that tells it where a file lives and marks that space as available for reuse. Until something else writes over that exact space, the underlying data is still physically present, and a trained examiner using standard forensic software can often locate and reassemble it.
Emptying a recycle bin, clearing a browser history, or uninstalling an app does not change that analysis the way most people expect. This is why the first advice any competent defense lawyer gives is the opposite of what panic suggests: do not touch the device. Altering it after you know about an investigation does not make evidence disappear, and it does create brand-new criminal exposure. We cover the search side of this in our guide to what happens when police search your phone in Arizona.
Where Does Deleted Data Actually Survive?
In more places than the average user has any reason to know about. These categories matter because several are created automatically by software rather than deliberately by a person — which is exactly where the defense argument starts.
- Unallocated space. The portion of a drive the system treats as free but which may still physically contain deleted file contents.
- File carving. A technique that scans raw storage for recognizable file structures and reassembles data even when the directory entry describing it is gone.
- Thumbnail caches. Operating systems and photo apps generate preview images automatically so folders load quickly, and those previews can persist after the original file is gone.
- File slack. Storage is allocated in fixed blocks. When a small file occupies a block once used by a larger one, remnants of the older data can remain.
- System restore points and shadow copies. Built-in backup features preserve older versions of data without any user action.
- Cloud-sync remnants. Sync services replicate content across devices and servers. Deleting on one device does not necessarily delete everywhere, and sync logs may outlive the files.
The same principles apply to digital evidence generally — we walk through them in a different context in our post on deleted evidence in Arizona image cases.
How Do Arizona Sexual Exploitation Investigations Begin?
Most start far from Arizona, long before anyone knocks on a door:
- Automated hash and PhotoDNA matching. Technology companies scan uploaded content against databases of known files and flag matches without a human reviewing the account.
- NCMEC CyberTipline report. The provider reports the flagged activity to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, which routes it to law enforcement by IP address.
- ICAC task force review. An Internet Crimes Against Children task force affiliate picks up the tip and begins building a case.
- Peer-to-peer monitoring. Investigators also run software that observes file-sharing networks and logs which addresses made particular files available.
- ISP subpoena. A subpoena converts the IP address into a subscriber name, billing address, and account history.
The defense challenge: every step in that chain identifies a connection or an account, not a human being. An IP address is assigned to a router, not a person. Households and businesses share networks, and networks can be accessed by people the subscriber never authorized. The name on the bill is simply the first place investigators look. Our overview of how Phoenix police investigate sex crimes covers what happens after that subpoena comes back.
How Does a Forensic Examination Work, and Where Can the Defense Push Back?
It runs in stages, and each stage has a documented standard that can be tested — what investigators can genuinely do, followed by where a defense team looks.
Seizure and warrant scope
Officers execute a search warrant and seize devices, storage media, and sometimes network hardware. The challenge: a warrant must describe what may be searched with particularity. Digital warrants are frequently broad enough that the search conducted exceeds what a judge actually authorized — an exam that began as a search for one thing and became an unrestricted tour of a person’s entire digital life is a suppression issue worth litigating.
Imaging with a write-blocker
Rather than examining the original, an examiner connects it through a write-blocker — hardware or software that permits reading while preventing anything from being written back — and creates a bit-for-bit forensic image. The challenge: whether a write-blocker was actually used and validated, and whether the original was powered on or browsed before imaging. Devices accessed before they were imaged raise real questions about what changed.
Hash verification
The examiner calculates a hash value — an MD5 or SHA digest — of the original and of the image. Matching values demonstrate the working copy is identical to what was seized. The challenge: that proves the copy is faithful and nothing more. A hash match to a database entry identifies a known file; it does not show who downloaded it, when, or whether any person ever viewed it.
The examiner’s report
The state’s examiner analyzes the image and issues a report identifying files, locations, and dates. The challenge: reports are summaries produced by software with settings, filters, and known limitations. The defense is entitled to look behind the summary — at the tools and versions used, the examiner’s training, what was excluded, and whether findings labeled as conclusions are actually assumptions.
Chain of custody
Every transfer of the device from seizure to lab to courtroom should be documented. The challenge: gaps, unlogged transfers, missing signatures, or a device that sat somewhere unaccounted for. Chain-of-custody failures go directly to whether the evidence a jury sees is what was actually taken from the defendant.
Why Is Attribution — Not Recovery — the Real Fight?
Because A.R.S. § 13-3553 does not criminalize the presence of data on a hard drive. It criminalizes knowingly possessing, receiving, transmitting, or exchanging a prohibited depiction, among other conduct. That mental state is an element the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt, and a forensic report frequently does not address it at all.
Consider what a recovered file in unallocated space actually establishes: that data existed in that location at some point. It does not establish who caused it to be there, whether a human ever saw it, whether it arrived by deliberate download or automatic process, or whether the person now charged even owned the device at the time. Several ordinary realities break that chain:
- Automatic caching. Browsers, messaging apps, and media software write files to disk as a byproduct of loading a page or previewing a message. No user decision is required and no notification is given.
- Malware and remote access. Compromised machines can be used for storage or routing by someone the owner has never met. Establishing or excluding this requires examination, not assumption.
- Shared and multi-user devices. Family computers, shared logins, roommates, employees, and guests all mean “the device” and “the defendant” are not the same thing. Where multiple profiles exist, the state must tie files to one of them.
- Pre-owned hardware. Used phones and computers frequently arrive carrying a prior owner’s data in unallocated space — data the new owner has no way to see and never meaningfully possessed.
- Unreliable timestamps. Created, modified, and accessed dates are routinely rewritten by system processes, and a timeline built on them can be wrong in ways that matter enormously.
None of this is a magic escape hatch, and no lawyer can promise you an outcome. But it is the difference between a case where the state’s report goes unexamined and one where every inferential leap in it is tested.
What Are the Arizona Stakes Under A.R.S. § 13-3553?
They are as high as Arizona sentencing gets, and the single biggest variable is the age of the minor depicted.
Sentencing Exposure for Sexual Exploitation of a Minor
Statutes: A.R.S. § 13-3553 & A.R.S. § 13-705
In State v. Berger, 212 Ariz. 473 (2006), the Arizona Supreme Court affirmed a 200-year sentence — 10 years on each of 20 counts, served consecutively — holding 4-1 that it was not grossly disproportionate under the Eighth Amendment, applying Ewing v. California, and noting the 200-year term was the minimum available under Arizona law. Certiorari was denied February 26, 2007. That is why the number of counts, and the attribution evidence behind each one, matters as much as any single forensic finding.
What Does an Independent Defense Forensic Examiner Do?
Independent verification. A defense examiner does not simply read the state’s report and agree with it. Working under the constraints a court imposes on this category of evidence, an independent examiner can:
- Re-image the evidence under court-supervised conditions so the analysis begins from a verified copy rather than a summary;
- Recalculate the state’s hash values to confirm the working image genuinely matches what was seized;
- Audit methodology — which tools, versions, and settings, what was filtered out, and whether conclusions follow from the data or fill gaps with assumption;
- Test attribution by examining user profiles, login records, installed software, remote-access artifacts, and evidence of malware;
- Determine whether timestamps support the state’s timeline, and whether files were the product of automatic system processes rather than deliberate user action.
We explain how we select and work with these specialists on our page about a digital forensics expert in Phoenix.
What Should You Do in the First 72 Hours?
Do this
- Preserve everything. Leave every device exactly as it is — powered off if it is already off, untouched if it is on.
- Call a defense lawyer before any interview. Not after. Before.
- Write down, for your attorney only, who had access to each device and account, and when.
- Locate purchase records for any used device, and note any prior malware warnings or account compromises.
Do not do this
- Do not delete, reset, or alter anything. Altering devices after you know about an investigation creates separate felony exposure for evidence tampering, and it destroys the very artifacts your own expert would use to show someone or something else was responsible.
- Do not consent to a search without counsel. Declining consent is not evidence of guilt — it preserves your ability to challenge the scope of a warrant later.
- Do not talk to detectives without a lawyer present, no matter how much you want to explain.
- Do not discuss the case with family, friends, anyone online, or anyone who may be a witness.
The Experts We Bring to the Table
A digital case is won or lost on technical ground. These are the specialists we work with to test what the state’s report claims — and what it quietly assumes.
Digital Forensic Examiner
Re-Imaging And Verification
Obtains a forensic copy of the seized media, recalculates the state’s MD5 and SHA hash values, and confirms whether the image the prosecution relies on truly matches what was taken.
Computer & Network Forensics Analyst
Auditing The Examination
Reviews the tools, versions, filters, and settings behind the state’s report, then examines router logs, network activity, and remote-access artifacts the original exam may never have looked at.
Malware & Intrusion Analyst
Testing The Compromise Defense
Examines a device for remote-access tools, botnet activity, and unauthorized processes that can place or route data without the owner’s knowledge or any deliberate user action.
Metadata & Timestamp Specialist
Breaking The State’s Timeline
Analyzes created, modified, and accessed dates against system events to show where the prosecution’s chronology rests on values that software rewrote automatically.
Peer-to-Peer Network Expert
Challenging File-Sharing Logs
Explains what monitoring software on a file-sharing network actually captured, and what it did not, including whether any human ever selected, opened, or knew about a shared file.
False-Attribution & Device-Sharing Expert
Separating Device From Defendant
Maps user profiles, logins, household and workplace access, and prior ownership to test whether the state can tie a file to one specific person rather than one specific machine.
How Tamou Law Group Defends A.R.S. § 13-3553 Cases
We start before charges are filed whenever we can. In the pre-charge window — after devices are seized but before a prosecutor makes a filing decision — there is real room to work: presenting exculpatory technical context, raising attribution problems early, and making sure the charging decision is not made on an unexamined report. Once a case is filed, we push hard on disclosure: the full forensic image, the examiner’s notes and bench records, tool names and versions, chain-of-custody documentation, the underlying CyberTipline and ICAC materials, and the ISP subpoena returns — not just the summary the state prefers to hand over. Because the statute requires the court to seal this evidence at the conclusion of proceedings, we address the terms of expert access early rather than losing weeks to it later.
We also give clients an unvarnished plea-collateral analysis before any decision — sex-offender registration exposure, the consecutive-sentencing rules under A.R.S. § 13-705, the difference between a count involving a minor under fifteen and one involving a 15-to-17-year-old, and what a given count structure realistically means over a lifetime. Our team includes former prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and public defenders, working from our offices at 9375 E Shea Blvd in Scottsdale and 3110 N Central Ave in Phoenix. Call 623-321-4699 for a confidential consultation.
Award-Winning Criminal Defense Law Firm
When you are looking for the best Phoenix sex crime lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.
Client reviews
What our clients say
I highly recommend Michael Tamou! He recently handled my GCE application, and I couldn't be more grateful for his help. From the very beginning, Michael was incredibly professional, knowledgeable, and thorough in making sure everything was completed perfectly. What stood out the most was his compassion—legal processes can be highly stressful, but he treated me with genuine care, kept me informed, and made me feel completely supported throughout. If you need a dedicated and skilled attorney who truly cares about his clients, look no further than Michael Tamou.
DMDan MillerGoogle review · Oct 2026Michael Tamou is an exceptional attorney! Facing a case that could affect my future was incredibly stressful, but from our first conversation, he provided honest guidance, reassurance, and a clear plan. He immediately got to work, personally reviewing the evidence and reports, filing the necessary motions, and keeping me informed throughout the process. His expertise, persistence, and genuine care gave me confidence that my case was in capable hands. I’m incredibly grateful that Michael achieved the outcome I had hoped and prayed for: my case was dismissed. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a skilled, dedicated, and caring attorney.
TJTammy JohnsonGoogle review · Sep 2026I had a great experience working with Michael. From the beginning, they were professional, knowledgeable, and responsive. They took the time to explain everything clearly, kept me informed throughout the process, and always had my best interests in mind. Their dedication and attention to detail gave me confidence during a stressful time, and they achieved a positive outcome for my case. I truly appreciate their hard work and would highly recommend them to anyone looking for an experienced and trustworthy attorney. Thank so much Tamou Law Group.
AAAlejandra ArevaloGoogle review · Aug 2026This is a great group of attorneys that work together!! There’s no other law firm I’d use for any situation. They put the time and effort into helping out any way they can. Mike and Kristie were both amazing in handling my situation and being transparent during the whole process.
TTJ2KGoogle review · Nov 2026I can’t thank Tamou Law Group enough for helping me with my case. They truly went above and beyond, and I’m incredibly grateful for their hard work, dedication, and support. Having a team in your corner that cares makes all the difference during a stressful time. Five stars don’t feel like enough! I highly recommend them to anyone looking for a law firm that will go the extra mile. Thank you for everything!
EGEvan GibraelGoogle review · Oct 2026I cannot recommend Ms. Jacie Cotterell highly enough. From start to finish, she was absolutely amazing throughout the entire process. She was professional, knowledgeable, and always took the time to answer my questions and explain everything clearly, which gave me a lot of peace of mind during a stressful situation. What stood out most was how genuinely caring and dedicated she was. I always felt like she had my best interests at heart, and her communication was excellent every step of the way. She made a difficult experience much easier to navigate and was always patient, supportive, and reassuring. I am incredibly grateful for all of her hard work and guidance. If you’re looking for someone who is compassionate, trustworthy, and truly committed to helping her clients, I wholeheartedly recommend Ms. Jacie Cotterell. Thank you again for everything, wyou made a lasting positive impact, and I truly appreciate all that you did.
BPBlaze PeralesGoogle review · Aug 2026Michael is hands down the best in the business. The day I called him he explained everything about my daughter’s situation and took the time to research the charges. He then gave me a price and gave me a chance to think it through before hiring him and two weeks later we retained his services. Michael went to work at that point with his team and brought results that no one else could do. My daughter now has a second chance to get her life on track over a few costly mistakes that could have landed her in prison and with a felony record but Michael did not allow that to happen. If you need solid representation that fights for you then hire Michael.
RHrob hardeeGoogle review · Aug 2026Kristie & Mike didn’t just see me as another client but as a person in need of help. The level of professionalism & communication going through my whole case made me feel at peace. Amazing lawyers & 10/10 would recommend!
DNDanny NguyenGoogle review · Oct 2026We {Carrie & Ted S.} are very pleased that we chose Mike Tamou Law Group to represent a criminal case that was against our granddaughter. The case against her was for two different ordeals, and in both situations - the cases were handled above & beyond what we expected. Because of Mike's quickness and professionalism, both situations were resolved in an expedited manor with positive results that we were extremely pleased with. Our granddaughter is also extremely pleased with the results. We would recommend {Mike} Tamou Law Group to anybody that is seeking legal advice in a criminal situation.
TSTed SchroederGoogle review · Jul 2026I had an aggravated DUI case class 4 felony. With an extensive criminal record of 7 prior felonies. Mr. Tamou did an outstanding job on my case, he got me the least possible amount of time. He got the prosecutor not to allege any of my priers. I did just 4 months with a probation tail. Other lawyers I spoke with prior to retaining M. Tamou, told me the best they could get, would be a few years in prison, due to my extensive criminal history. Michael said he would fight for me and he delivered. He has relationships with the prosecutors and judges and is a great negotiator. Also he was great with communicating with me throughout the process. Always returned my calls and text messages and kept me informed. I highly recommend him.
PGPaul GonzalezGoogle review · May 2026I had a great experience with Tamou Law! Michael was very helpful. He took the time to explain everything in a way that was easy for me to understand, which made the entire process feel much less overwhelming. He was patient, professional, and always made sure I felt informed and comfortable with each step. I truly appreciated his communication and support throughout! HIGHLY RECOMMEND!
SSandraGoogle review · Apr 2026Michael is truly amazing. I am so happy that I chose him to help me with my legal situation. He is completely trustworthy. Michael was completely transparent and honest throughout the entire process and offered support to me like I was his own family member. He was patient and understanding and prompt in responding to any of my inquiries during my waiting period. His explanations were clear and logical, and I felt beyond comfortable with him. I really appreciate him and the staff in his practice, and I highly recommend him for anyone's legal needs!! Thank you, Michael! You're really the best. I appreciate you!
RLRochelle LeeGoogle review · Feb 2026Our family went through the worst time of our lives! It was wonderful to have Michael on our side fighting for us and giving us the advice we needed to take the right steps. Case Dismissed! Thank you for your hard work, dedication, and support.
RERussell EllisGoogle review · Aug 2026He's the Greatest lawyer we could have ever asked for he put his heart into helping us and we came out with exactly what we wanted! I highly recommend him!
JOJose OrtizGoogle review · Oct 2026⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ I cannot thank Mike Tamou enough for what he did for my family. My son was facing serious charges that could have changed the course of his life forever. From the very beginning, Mr. Tamou treated us with compassion, respect, and honesty. He took the time to explain every step of the process, always making sure we understood what was happening and what to expect. His professionalism and dedication were unmatched. He worked tirelessly on my son’s case, exploring every possible option and fighting for the best outcome. Because of Mike’s skill, expertise, and determination, my son was saved from going to jail and now has the opportunity to move forward and rebuild his life. I am forever grateful for his hard work and would highly recommend Mike Tamou to anyone in need of a strong, knowledgeable, and caring defense attorney. He doesn’t just represent his clients—he truly fight for them.
EHErin HernandezGoogle review · 2025Michael did an amazing job helping my loved one with his case. He was the first call I made and I knew right then how much he truly cared for his clients. I highly recommend Tamou Law to anyone who reads this review. Michael worked extremely hard for us and exceeded my expectations of the outcome. He is compassionate, very knowledgeable, experienced, respected and very fair. He always took the time to take my calls and to listen to questions that we had. He works hard for his clients and is the kind of guy you want on your side. Thanks again Michael. You were a pleasure to work with.
LBLaurie BryantGoogle review · 2024Great experience from start to finish. Professional, responsive, and made a stressful situation much easier. I felt confident the whole time and really appreciated Michael’s support. Highly recommend!
SMShivraj MannGoogle review · Apr 2026Had a situation that Michael helped me through with the best possible outcome. Very responsive and actually cares about his clients.
CJCaleb JohnsonGoogle review · Aug 2026My son was an idiot and was in serious trouble. He was facing prison time. Fortunately, we were referred to Tamou Law Group by trusted friends and we are beyond grateful that we listened. From the onset, Michael helped to put our family at ease. We discussed the charges where Mike provided insight that helped adjust our expectations. Sure enough, it played out nearly exactly like Mike predicted. Mike put a strong case together – which resulted with no jail time! If you find yourself in need of legal representation, you should hire Michael Timou!
AHArmando HernandezGoogle review · 2025I can’t recommend Tamou law group enough. From day one, Micheal took the time to really listen, explained my options in a way that actually made sense, and built a strong strategy that put my mind at ease. The entire team was professional, responsive and genuinely caring throughout the whole process. They fought tirelessly and delivered a result that far exceeded my expectations. If you need a law firm you can trust completely, this is it. Thank you!
BKBryan KingGoogle review · Dec 2025
Why Tamou Law Group for Sex Crime Charges
A sex-crime allegation is usually one account against another, and the State files first and investigates second. We treat these cases as evidence cases from day one: digital records, forensic interviews, timelines and the gaps between them.
A dismissal on the hardest charge
Our published results include a sexual assault and sexual abuse case dismissed after extensive litigation, and reductions on luring, sexual conduct with a minor, molestation and sexual exploitation charges. These are the cases most firms plead early.
Former prosecutors who charged these cases
Attorneys on our team have worked inside the offices that file sex-crime charges in Arizona. They know how forensic interviews are scored, what a detective needs before a confrontation call, and which weaknesses the State hopes you never notice.
Pre-charge defense
Sex-crime cases often begin with a detective’s call, before any charge exists. That window is where a case is declined, downgraded or filed as alleged, and we have handled that stage from both sides of the table.
Published results in this area
| Case | Charges | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| State v. W.N. | Sexual assault and sexual abuse (A.R.S. 13-1406, 13-1404) | Case dismissed |
| State v. P.J. | Sexual abuse and indecent exposure (13-1404, 13-1402) | Reduced charge |
| State v. N.D. | Luring a minor and attempt (13-3554, 13-1001) | Reduced charge |
| State v. L.B. | Sexual conduct with a minor and attempt (13-1405, 13-1001) | Reduced charge |
| State v. H.V. | Molestation of a child and sexual abuse (13-1410, 13-1404) | Reduced charge |
| State v. V.R. | Sexual exploitation of a minor (13-3553) | Reduced charge |
| State v. G.D. | Indecent exposure and disorderly conduct (13-1402, 13-2904) | Deferred prosecution |
Anonymized outcomes from our case results page. Every case is different; past results do not guarantee a future outcome.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can police recover deleted files from a phone or computer?
Usually, yes. On most devices, deleting a file marks its space as reusable rather than erasing the underlying data, so a forensic examiner can often recover it until that space is overwritten. Copies also survive in caches, backups, and cloud-synced folders that a user never sees or manages.
Does recovering a deleted file prove I knowingly possessed it?
No. Recovery shows a file existed on a device. It does not show who put it there, whether anyone opened it, or whether the user knew it existed. A.R.S. 13-3553 requires the state to prove a knowing mental state, and that is a separate question from data recovery.
What is a hash value, and what does a hash match actually prove?
A hash is a digital fingerprint calculated from a file’s contents. A match tells you the file on a device is identical to a file already in a known database. It identifies the file. It says nothing about who downloaded it, when, or whether any person ever viewed it.
How do Arizona sexual exploitation investigations usually start?
Most begin outside Arizona. A provider files a CyberTipline report with NCMEC after automated hash or PhotoDNA matching, the tip is routed to an ICAC task force, and investigators subpoena an internet service provider to link an IP address to a subscriber account and a physical address.
Can malware or another person put files on a device I own?
Yes, and it happens. Shared computers, family accounts, roommates, guest Wi-Fi, remote-access malware, browser software that caches images automatically, and pre-owned hardware that was never wiped by its prior owner all create realistic paths for data to reach a device without the current user knowing.
Should I let detectives search my phone if I have nothing to hide?
Talk to a lawyer before consenting to anything. Consent waives search protections you may never get back, and a broad consent can hand over years of unrelated data. Declining to consent is not evidence of guilt. It preserves your ability to challenge the scope of any later search warrant.
Can I delete files or reset my device after police contact me?
No. Preserve everything exactly as it is. Deleting, resetting, or altering a device after you know about an investigation can create separate felony exposure for evidence tampering, and it destroys the very metadata your own expert would use to show that someone or something else put the files there.
What is the penalty for sexual exploitation of a minor in Arizona?
Sexual exploitation of a minor under A.R.S. 13-3553 is a class 2 felony. If the minor is under fifteen, it is punished under A.R.S. 13-705 as a dangerous crime against children, carrying a first-offense range of 10 years minimum, 17 years presumptive, and 24 years maximum.
Can my defense team hire its own forensic examiner?
Yes, and in a contested digital case it is often essential. An independent examiner can obtain a forensic copy, verify the state’s hash values, review the examiner’s methodology and tool settings, and test attribution questions the state’s report may never have asked, such as who else used the device.
What happens if the state’s forensic image does not verify?
It becomes a serious evidentiary problem for the prosecution. Hash verification exists to prove the working copy is identical to the seized original. If the values do not match, or the verification steps were never documented, the defense can challenge the integrity and admissibility of everything drawn from that image.
Two Arizona Offices, One Team
We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.
Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
