Call Us
Contact Us
Text Us
Call or Text Today 623-321-4699

Is Misusing Electronic Communication a Crime in AZ? (13-2916)

Is Misusing Electronic Communication a Crime in AZ? (13-2916)

Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · DUI Defense

5.0 · DUI Defense

A threatening text or repeated unwanted call can become a criminal charge under A.R.S. 13-2916 — here’s what the statute actually requires the state to prove.

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal Defense2025 Super Lawyers SouthwestNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association
Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · DUI Defense

★★★★★ 5.0 · DUI Defense

Written and legally reviewed by Michael Tamou, Founding Attorney of Tamou Law Group, PLLC.

As Seen On

As Seen On NBC News, USA Today, Digital Journal, AZ Central, Lamar, ABC News, Fox News

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal DefenseNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association2025 Super Lawyers Southwest

What Is A.R.S. § 13-2916?

A.R.S. § 13-2916 makes it unlawful to knowingly terrify, intimidate, threaten or harass a specific person through electronic communication — including obscene or lewd language, threats of physical harm to a person or property, and repeated anonymous or unwanted messages that disturb that person’s peace or privacy.

5 Key Aspects of ARS §13-2916: Unlawful Use of Electronic Communication in Arizona Discussing cybercrimes, harassment, and legal boundaries in electronic communication.

In the digital age, the use of electronic communication has become ubiquitous, connecting people across the globe in an instant. However, this technological advancement has also led to new avenues for misuse and abuse. In Arizona, the legal system has responded to these challenges by implementing statutes like ARS §13-2916 to govern the unlawful use of electronic communication. At Tamou Law Group PLLC, we understand the complexities of this law and are here to guide you through its key aspects. This blog post aims to dissect ARS §13-2916, shedding light on its implications and how it affects Arizona residents.1

Definition and Scope

ARS §13-2916 broadly defines the unlawful use of electronic communication as any use of an electronic device to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy, or offend someone. This statute encompasses a wide range of electronic devices, including but not limited to, telephones, computers, and other devices capable of transmitting written messages, sounds, images, or data. The law is designed to address issues ranging from cyberbullying to more severe forms of electronic harassment.2

Acts Covered Under the Statute

The statute explicitly lists several acts that constitute unlawful use of electronic communication. These include:

  • Communicating with someone anonymously or otherwise for the purpose of harassing or annoying them.
  • Continuing to communicate with someone after being requested to stop.
  • Using electronic communication to threaten, terrify, or intimidate someone.
  • Using obscene, lewd, or profane language, or suggesting a lewd or lascivious act with the intent to harass.
  • Initiating communication at inconvenient hours, repeatedly, or in a manner likely to harass or cause alarm.

This list is not exhaustive but provides a clear framework of what behaviors are considered unlawful under Arizona law.3

Legal Consequences

Violating ARS §13-2916 can lead to significant legal repercussions. The statute classifies the offense as a class 1 misdemeanor, which is the most serious misdemeanor offense in Arizona. Convicted individuals may face penalties including fines, community service, probation, and even jail time. Moreover, the offense can have long-lasting effects on an individual’s criminal record, potentially impacting employment opportunities, educational pursuits, and other areas of life.4

Defenses and Legal Strategies

There are several defenses available to individuals accused of violating ARS §13-2916. These might include proving that the communication was not intended to harass, annoy, or alarm the recipient, or that the alleged victim’s request to cease communication was not communicated to the accused. Additionally, the context of the communication and the relationship between the parties involved can also play a crucial role in the defense strategy.At Tamou Law Group PLLC, we meticulously evaluate the circumstances surrounding each case to develop a robust defense strategy tailored to our client’s specific situation.5

The Importance of Legal Representation

Navigating the complexities of ARS §13-2916 requires a nuanced understanding of Arizona’s legal landscape. Whether you are facing charges under this statute or believe you are a victim of unlawful electronic communication, it is imperative to seek competent legal representation. At Tamou Law Group PLLC, our experienced attorneys are well-versed in the intricacies of electronic communication laws and are committed to providing our clients with the highest level of legal support.

In Conclusion

The digital realm has transformed the way we communicate, but it has also introduced new legal challenges. ARS §13-2916 serves as a critical tool in Arizona’s legal arsenal to combat the misuse of electronic communication. Understanding this statute and its implications is essential for anyone navigating the digital world.If you or someone you know is dealing with issues related to unlawful use of electronic communication in Arizona, do not hesitate to contact Tamou Law Group PLLC at 623-321-4699. Our experienced team is here to provide guidance, support, and robust legal representation to ensure your rights are protected.

Awards & Recognition

Our recognition for Phoenix DUI defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:

When you are looking for the best Phoenix DUI lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors.

Client Reviews

What Clients Say About Tamou Law

Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.

5.0
Google Rating
1,000+
Cases Won
100%
Criminal Defense
24/7
Availability
Visit Us

Two Arizona Offices, One Team

We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.

Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Related Posts: