Call Us
Contact Us
Text Us
Call or Text Today 623-321-4699

Is Possessing a Forgery Device a Crime in AZ? ARS 13-2003

Is Possessing a Forgery Device a Crime in AZ? ARS 13-2003

Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Criminal Defense

5.0 · Criminal Defense

Police say your equipment was for forgery? Under A.R.S. § 13-2003 even ordinary printers and software can be charged as a Class 5 felony if the State can infer intent — do not explain the equipment to investigators before calling us.

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal Defense2025 Super Lawyers SouthwestNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association
Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Criminal Defense

★★★★★ 5.0 · Criminal Defense

Written and legally reviewed by Michael Tamou, Founding Attorney of Tamou Law Group, PLLC.

As Seen On

As Seen On NBC News, USA Today, Digital Journal, AZ Central, Lamar, ABC News, Fox News

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal DefenseNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association2025 Super Lawyers Southwest

Is Possessing a Forgery Device a Crime in Arizona?

Yes. Criminal possession of a forgery device under A.R.S. § 13-2003 is a felony even if nothing was ever forged: a Class 6 felony for devices specifically designed for forging written instruments possessed with intent to commit fraud, and a Class 5 felony for anything merely adaptable for forgery, including ordinary computers and printers, possessed with intent to use it for forgery.

Yes — and it is a felony even if you never forged anything. Under A.R.S. § 13-2003, criminal possession of a forgery device punishes the tools, not the finished forgery. The statute reaches plates, dies, apparatus, equipment, software, access devices, and even ordinary materials and supplies — when they are connected to the intent the statute requires.

The Two Forms of the Charge

The statute has two distinct prongs, and they carry different classes:

  • 13-2003(A)(1) — Class 6 felony: making or possessing a device specifically designed or adapted for forging written instruments, with knowledge of its character and intent to commit fraud. Think check-printing plates, ID-card presses, embossers, and dedicated forgery software.
  • 13-2003(A)(2) — Class 5 felony: making or possessing any device or material merely adaptable for forgery, with intent to use it (or let someone else use it) for forgery. This is the broader, more serious prong — and it can sweep in everyday items: a laptop, a scanner, a printer, blank card stock.

Read that again, because it surprises people: the ordinary equipment prong is the higher felony class. What converts a home printer into a Class 5 felony is not the machine — it is the intent the State claims goes with it.

Intent Is the Entire Case

Nobody gets charged for owning a scanner. These cases are built on context evidence: what was found alongside the equipment (blank checks, other people’s IDs, card stock, templates), what was on the computer, what messages say, and what any completed documents look like. That means the case is only as strong as the inference of intent — and inferences can be fought:

  • Equipment with legitimate uses and a legitimate explanation — design work, printing businesses, hobby crafts — undercuts the inference;
  • Shared spaces and shared devices raise the same constructive-possession problems as drug cases: whose intent, exactly?
  • Software cases turn on who installed and used what, which forensic examination can genuinely answer;
  • And where the alleged purpose was a specific document, the State’s theory must match the physical evidence.
⚠️ Why this matters: Forgery-device charges rarely travel alone. Prosecutors typically stack them with forgery (A.R.S. 13-2002), identity theft (13-2008), or fraudulent schemes, and the device count is often the State’s fallback when it cannot prove a completed forgery. Do not treat the “possession” count as the minor charge in the case, it is sometimes the only one that survives, and it is still a felony.

Penalties

A first-offense Class 5 felony carries probation up to 2.5 years in prison; a Class 6, probation up to 2 years. Both bring a felony record with the standard collateral damage — and because these are fraud-family offenses, the professional-licensing and employment consequences tend to be worse than the sentence itself. Class 6 counts can often be designated misdemeanors; that, plus diversion in appropriate cases, is a central negotiating target.

Defenses

  • No intent to defraud or use for forgery — the equipment had a lawful purpose and the State’s inference fails;
  • No knowing possession — shared homes, shared computers, roommates’ property;
  • Suppression — these cases usually start with a search, and an unlawful search takes the devices out of evidence;
  • Not “specifically designed or adapted” — fighting the (A)(1) characterization, and the class, of ordinary equipment;
  • Reduction and designation — moving an (A)(2) Class 5 to an (A)(1) Class 6, then to a designatable misdemeanor.
Key takeaway: Criminal possession of a forgery device (A.R.S. 13-2003) punishes the tools of forgery: a Class 6 felony for devices specifically designed for forging with fraud intent, and, counterintuitively, a Class 5 felony for ordinary items merely adaptable for forgery when possessed with intent to use them for it. Intent is the whole case, and intent inferences can be fought.
Our Defense Team

The Experts We Bring to the Table

Forgery-device cases are inference cases: ordinary equipment plus a story about intent. We bring the specialists who test that story.

Digital Forensics Specialists

Who Used the Device

Examine computers and software to establish who installed, accessed, and used what, and when.

Questioned-Document Examiners

The Alleged Forgeries

Analyze any completed documents the State claims the devices produced, and whether they actually match.

Search-and-Seizure Analysts

How It Was Found

Attack the warrant or search that produced the equipment, the origin of nearly every device case.

Legitimate-Use Witnesses

The Lawful Explanation

Document the business, hobby, or professional uses that explain the equipment innocently.

Possession Analysts

Whose Intent?

Untangle shared homes, shared devices, and roommate property from the State’s constructive-possession theory.

Mitigation Specialists

Designation & Diversion

Position eligible cases for misdemeanor designation, diversion, and outcomes that avoid a fraud felony record.

How Tamou Law Group Defends Forgery Device Cases

We defend the inference. The State must connect equipment to a specific fraudulent intent, and that connection usually rests on context that has innocent explanations, forensic questions about who used what, and a search that can be challenged. Where the evidence is genuinely mixed, the class ladder (5 to 6 to designated misdemeanor) gives real room to negotiate.

Related reading: falsely accused of identity theft (13-2008), caught with a fake ID, and our Scottsdale white collar crimes lawyer page. Call 623-321-4699, 24/7.

Keep Reading

Related Arizona Theft & Property Crime Guides

Awards & Recognition

Our recognition for Phoenix criminal defense defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:

When you are looking for the best Phoenix criminal defense lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.

Client Reviews

What Clients Say About Tamou Law

Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.

5.0
Google Rating
1,000+
Cases Won
100%
Criminal Defense
24/7
Availability
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Is possession of a forgery device a felony in Arizona?

Yes. Under A.R.S. 13-2003 it is a Class 6 felony to make or possess a device specifically designed for forging with intent to commit fraud, and a Class 5 felony to possess anything adaptable for forgery with intent to use it for forgery.

Can I be charged for owning a printer or scanner in Arizona?

Only if the State can prove you possessed it with intent to use it for forgery, that is the element that converts ordinary equipment into a Class 5 felony under 13-2003(A)(2). Intent is inferred from context, and that inference is very much contestable.

What counts as a forgery device under Arizona law?

The statute is broad: plates, dies, apparatus, equipment, software, access devices, articles, materials, goods, property, and supplies, either specifically designed for forging written instruments or merely adaptable for that use with the requisite intent.

Do I have to actually forge something to be charged?

No. 13-2003 punishes possession of the tools with the required knowledge and intent, no completed forgery is necessary. It is often the fallback charge when the State cannot prove a forgery actually occurred.

What is the penalty for possessing a forgery device in Arizona?

A first-offense Class 5 felony carries probation up to 2.5 years in prison, and a Class 6 probation up to 2 years, plus a fraud-family felony record whose licensing and employment consequences often outlast the sentence.

Why is the “adaptable” version a higher felony class?

Because 13-2003(A)(2) requires proof of intent to actually use the item for forgery, a more specific criminal purpose, while (A)(1) covers dedicated forgery tools possessed with general fraud intent. It surprises people, but the ordinary-equipment prong is the Class 5.

Is forgery device possession the same as forgery?

No. Forgery under A.R.S. 13-2002 is a Class 4 felony for falsely making or altering a written instrument with intent to defraud. The device charge covers the tools, and prosecutors frequently file both together.

Can a forgery device charge be dismissed?

Yes, most often where the intent inference fails, the possession was not knowing (shared spaces and devices), or the search that found the equipment was unlawful and the evidence is suppressed.

Will a forgery device conviction affect my professional license?

Almost certainly, it is a fraud-family felony, the category licensing boards treat most harshly. Avoiding the conviction through designation, diversion, or dismissal is usually the priority for licensed professionals.

What should I do if police seized my computer or equipment?

Do not explain the equipment’s purpose to investigators, your explanation becomes the intent evidence. Talk to a defense lawyer first; the search, the forensics, and the intent inference all need professional scrutiny.

Visit Us

Two Arizona Offices, One Team

We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.

Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Related Posts: