Is It Illegal to Record Someone in Arizona? ARS 13-3019
Charged over a recording? Arizona is one-party consent for audio, but under A.R.S. § 13-3019 secret recording in a private situation is a Class 5 felony, and sharing it a Class 4 — with sex-offense stakes. Call before any interview.
As Seen On

Recognized By
Featured Answer
Is It Illegal to Record Someone in Arizona?
It depends. Arizona is a one-party consent state, recording a conversation you are part of is lawful under A.R.S. §§ 13-3005 and 13-3012. But secretly photographing, filming, or viewing a person where they expect privacy, in a bathroom, bedroom, or locker room, or capturing private body areas, is a Class 5 felony under A.R.S. § 13-3019, and disclosing such a recording is a Class 4 felony.

It depends entirely on what you record. Arizona is a one-party consent state for conversations: under A.R.S. § 13-3005 and the exemptions in § 13-3012(9), recording a conversation is lawful if you are a party to it or a party consents. But visual recording is governed by a much stricter statute: A.R.S. § 13-3019 makes it a felony to secretly photograph, film, or record a person — with or without a device — in places and situations where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Audio: The One-Party Consent Rule
Intercepting a conversation you are not part of, without any party’s consent, is a Class 5 felony under 13-3005 — that is the wiretapping scenario: bugging a room, recording your ex’s phone calls, planting a recorder. But if you are a participant in the conversation, or one participant consents, the recording is exempt under 13-3012(9). That is why people may lawfully record their own phone calls and meetings in Arizona — and why secretly recording other people’s conversations is a felony.
Visual: Where Recording Becomes a Sex-Crime-Adjacent Felony
Section 13-3019 prohibits knowingly and secretly photographing, videotaping, filming, digitally recording, or even viewing another person without consent in two situations:
- In a restroom, bathroom, locker room, bedroom, or other place with a reasonable expectation of privacy, while the person is urinating, defecating, dressing, undressing, nude, or engaged in sexual activity; or
- In a manner that captures the person’s genitalia, buttock, or female breast (clothed or unclothed) that is not otherwise visible to the public — the “upskirt” provision.
The classification ladder is steep:
- Class 5 felony — the standard violation with a device;
- Class 6 felony — a violation without a device (a second offense returns to Class 5); and
- Class 4 felony — disclosing or publishing such a recording when the person depicted is recognizable.
Note that disclosure is its own crime: forwarding or posting a recording made in violation of the statute is separately punishable — and more severely than making it.
The Neighboring Statutes
Prosecutors choose between several overlapping laws in recording cases: voyeurism under A.R.S. § 13-1424 (surveilling for sexual gratification), unlawful disclosure of intimate images under § 13-1425 (“revenge porn”), and 13-3019. Which statute is charged changes the felony class, the registration exposure, and the available defenses — and it is frequently negotiable. See our guides to voyeurism defense and sextortion under 13-1428.
How Is Voyeurism Different From Surreptitious Recording?
Both statutes cover recording someone without consent, and prosecutors frequently charge them together, but they are different offenses with different elements and different consequences. The single biggest difference is purpose: voyeurism requires the State to prove a sexual motive, and surreptitious recording does not.
| Voyeurism — § 13-1424 | Surreptitious recording — § 13-3019 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sexual purpose | Required. The invasion of privacy must be “for the purpose of sexual stimulation” | Not an element. Motive is irrelevant to guilt |
| Reach | Invading privacy where there is a reasonable expectation, while the person is undressed, in sexual contact, or urinating or defecating | The same situations, plus capturing genitalia, buttock or breast “whether clothed or unclothed” that is not otherwise visible to the public |
| Class | Class 5 felony; class 4 if distributed and the person depicted is recognizable | Class 5 felony; class 6 if no device was used; class 4 if distributed and recognizable |
| Where it sits in the code | Chapter 14, Sexual Offenses | Chapter 30, Eavesdropping and Communications |
| Sex offender registration | Not mandatory, but the sentencing judge may order it for any chapter 14 offense under § 13-3821(C) | Only if the State pleads and proves a sexual motivation special allegation under § 13-118 |
The chapter each statute sits in is not a technicality. Neither offense appears in the mandatory registration list at § 13-3821(A). But because voyeurism is a chapter 14 offense, a judge already has discretion to order registration at sentencing. For a § 13-3019 conviction the State has to plead a § 13-118 sexual motivation allegation and prove it beyond a reasonable doubt before the judge has that power at all. That is why defeating the allegation is often worth more than fighting the recording itself.
More on each: surreptitious recording defense under § 13-3019 and whether voyeurism is a felony in Arizona.
Defenses
- No reasonable expectation of privacy — public places, visible-to-the-public settings, and posted-security contexts fall outside the statute;
- Consent — actual or reasonably understood, particularly between partners;
- Not secret — open, known recording is not “surreptitious”;
- Identity and attribution — who actually made or shared the file;
- Statutory exemptions — posted security systems, law enforcement, child monitoring.
The Experts We Bring to the Table
Recording cases are decided by privacy expectations, consent evidence, and device forensics. We bring the specialists on all three.
Digital Forensics Specialists
Files, Devices & Metadata
Establish when recordings were made, on what device, by whom, and who actually shared them.
Privacy-Expectation Analysts
Where the Line Sits
Analyze the location, visibility, and posted-notice facts that decide whether an expectation of privacy existed.
Relationship-Context Investigators
The Consent Record
Document the communications and history that show recording was known, consented to, or reasonably understood.
Search-and-Seizure Analysts
How Police Got the Files
Challenge the phone searches and warrants that produce the evidence in nearly every one of these cases.
Charging-Statute Analysts
3019 vs. 1424 vs. 1425
Map which of the overlapping statutes actually fits, and fight the one with registration exposure.
Mitigation Specialists
Containing the Damage
Manage deletion, disclosure prevention, and resolutions that protect clients from sex-offense consequences.
How Tamou Law Group Defends Recording Cases
These prosecutions carry sex-offense stakes, so we defend them at every layer: the phone search that produced the files, the privacy-expectation and consent elements, the attribution question of who actually recorded or shared, and the charging choice among 13-3019, voyeurism, and the intimate-image statutes. The right statute, or none, is often the whole fight.
Related reading: voyeurism defense (13-1424), was the search of your phone legal?, and our Scottsdale sex crimes lawyer page. Call 623-321-4699, 24/7.
Award-Winning Criminal Defense Law Firm
When you are looking for the best Phoenix sex crime lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.
Client reviews
What our clients say
I highly recommend Michael Tamou! He recently handled my GCE application, and I couldn't be more grateful for his help. From the very beginning, Michael was incredibly professional, knowledgeable, and thorough in making sure everything was completed perfectly. What stood out the most was his compassion—legal processes can be highly stressful, but he treated me with genuine care, kept me informed, and made me feel completely supported throughout. If you need a dedicated and skilled attorney who truly cares about his clients, look no further than Michael Tamou.
DMDan MillerGoogle review · Oct 2026Michael Tamou is an exceptional attorney! Facing a case that could affect my future was incredibly stressful, but from our first conversation, he provided honest guidance, reassurance, and a clear plan. He immediately got to work, personally reviewing the evidence and reports, filing the necessary motions, and keeping me informed throughout the process. His expertise, persistence, and genuine care gave me confidence that my case was in capable hands. I’m incredibly grateful that Michael achieved the outcome I had hoped and prayed for: my case was dismissed. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a skilled, dedicated, and caring attorney.
TJTammy JohnsonGoogle review · Sep 2026I had a great experience working with Michael. From the beginning, they were professional, knowledgeable, and responsive. They took the time to explain everything clearly, kept me informed throughout the process, and always had my best interests in mind. Their dedication and attention to detail gave me confidence during a stressful time, and they achieved a positive outcome for my case. I truly appreciate their hard work and would highly recommend them to anyone looking for an experienced and trustworthy attorney. Thank so much Tamou Law Group.
AAAlejandra ArevaloGoogle review · Aug 2026This is a great group of attorneys that work together!! There’s no other law firm I’d use for any situation. They put the time and effort into helping out any way they can. Mike and Kristie were both amazing in handling my situation and being transparent during the whole process.
TTJ2KGoogle review · Nov 2026I can’t thank Tamou Law Group enough for helping me with my case. They truly went above and beyond, and I’m incredibly grateful for their hard work, dedication, and support. Having a team in your corner that cares makes all the difference during a stressful time. Five stars don’t feel like enough! I highly recommend them to anyone looking for a law firm that will go the extra mile. Thank you for everything!
EGEvan GibraelGoogle review · Oct 2026I cannot recommend Ms. Jacie Cotterell highly enough. From start to finish, she was absolutely amazing throughout the entire process. She was professional, knowledgeable, and always took the time to answer my questions and explain everything clearly, which gave me a lot of peace of mind during a stressful situation. What stood out most was how genuinely caring and dedicated she was. I always felt like she had my best interests at heart, and her communication was excellent every step of the way. She made a difficult experience much easier to navigate and was always patient, supportive, and reassuring. I am incredibly grateful for all of her hard work and guidance. If you’re looking for someone who is compassionate, trustworthy, and truly committed to helping her clients, I wholeheartedly recommend Ms. Jacie Cotterell. Thank you again for everything, wyou made a lasting positive impact, and I truly appreciate all that you did.
BPBlaze PeralesGoogle review · Aug 2026Michael is hands down the best in the business. The day I called him he explained everything about my daughter’s situation and took the time to research the charges. He then gave me a price and gave me a chance to think it through before hiring him and two weeks later we retained his services. Michael went to work at that point with his team and brought results that no one else could do. My daughter now has a second chance to get her life on track over a few costly mistakes that could have landed her in prison and with a felony record but Michael did not allow that to happen. If you need solid representation that fights for you then hire Michael.
RHrob hardeeGoogle review · Aug 2026Kristie & Mike didn’t just see me as another client but as a person in need of help. The level of professionalism & communication going through my whole case made me feel at peace. Amazing lawyers & 10/10 would recommend!
DNDanny NguyenGoogle review · Oct 2026We {Carrie & Ted S.} are very pleased that we chose Mike Tamou Law Group to represent a criminal case that was against our granddaughter. The case against her was for two different ordeals, and in both situations - the cases were handled above & beyond what we expected. Because of Mike's quickness and professionalism, both situations were resolved in an expedited manor with positive results that we were extremely pleased with. Our granddaughter is also extremely pleased with the results. We would recommend {Mike} Tamou Law Group to anybody that is seeking legal advice in a criminal situation.
TSTed SchroederGoogle review · Jul 2026I had an aggravated DUI case class 4 felony. With an extensive criminal record of 7 prior felonies. Mr. Tamou did an outstanding job on my case, he got me the least possible amount of time. He got the prosecutor not to allege any of my priers. I did just 4 months with a probation tail. Other lawyers I spoke with prior to retaining M. Tamou, told me the best they could get, would be a few years in prison, due to my extensive criminal history. Michael said he would fight for me and he delivered. He has relationships with the prosecutors and judges and is a great negotiator. Also he was great with communicating with me throughout the process. Always returned my calls and text messages and kept me informed. I highly recommend him.
PGPaul GonzalezGoogle review · May 2026I had a great experience with Tamou Law! Michael was very helpful. He took the time to explain everything in a way that was easy for me to understand, which made the entire process feel much less overwhelming. He was patient, professional, and always made sure I felt informed and comfortable with each step. I truly appreciated his communication and support throughout! HIGHLY RECOMMEND!
SSandraGoogle review · Apr 2026Michael is truly amazing. I am so happy that I chose him to help me with my legal situation. He is completely trustworthy. Michael was completely transparent and honest throughout the entire process and offered support to me like I was his own family member. He was patient and understanding and prompt in responding to any of my inquiries during my waiting period. His explanations were clear and logical, and I felt beyond comfortable with him. I really appreciate him and the staff in his practice, and I highly recommend him for anyone's legal needs!! Thank you, Michael! You're really the best. I appreciate you!
RLRochelle LeeGoogle review · Feb 2026Our family went through the worst time of our lives! It was wonderful to have Michael on our side fighting for us and giving us the advice we needed to take the right steps. Case Dismissed! Thank you for your hard work, dedication, and support.
RERussell EllisGoogle review · Aug 2026He's the Greatest lawyer we could have ever asked for he put his heart into helping us and we came out with exactly what we wanted! I highly recommend him!
JOJose OrtizGoogle review · Oct 2026⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ I cannot thank Mike Tamou enough for what he did for my family. My son was facing serious charges that could have changed the course of his life forever. From the very beginning, Mr. Tamou treated us with compassion, respect, and honesty. He took the time to explain every step of the process, always making sure we understood what was happening and what to expect. His professionalism and dedication were unmatched. He worked tirelessly on my son’s case, exploring every possible option and fighting for the best outcome. Because of Mike’s skill, expertise, and determination, my son was saved from going to jail and now has the opportunity to move forward and rebuild his life. I am forever grateful for his hard work and would highly recommend Mike Tamou to anyone in need of a strong, knowledgeable, and caring defense attorney. He doesn’t just represent his clients—he truly fight for them.
EHErin HernandezGoogle review · 2025Michael did an amazing job helping my loved one with his case. He was the first call I made and I knew right then how much he truly cared for his clients. I highly recommend Tamou Law to anyone who reads this review. Michael worked extremely hard for us and exceeded my expectations of the outcome. He is compassionate, very knowledgeable, experienced, respected and very fair. He always took the time to take my calls and to listen to questions that we had. He works hard for his clients and is the kind of guy you want on your side. Thanks again Michael. You were a pleasure to work with.
LBLaurie BryantGoogle review · 2024Great experience from start to finish. Professional, responsive, and made a stressful situation much easier. I felt confident the whole time and really appreciated Michael’s support. Highly recommend!
SMShivraj MannGoogle review · Apr 2026Had a situation that Michael helped me through with the best possible outcome. Very responsive and actually cares about his clients.
CJCaleb JohnsonGoogle review · Aug 2026My son was an idiot and was in serious trouble. He was facing prison time. Fortunately, we were referred to Tamou Law Group by trusted friends and we are beyond grateful that we listened. From the onset, Michael helped to put our family at ease. We discussed the charges where Mike provided insight that helped adjust our expectations. Sure enough, it played out nearly exactly like Mike predicted. Mike put a strong case together – which resulted with no jail time! If you find yourself in need of legal representation, you should hire Michael Timou!
AHArmando HernandezGoogle review · 2025I can’t recommend Tamou law group enough. From day one, Micheal took the time to really listen, explained my options in a way that actually made sense, and built a strong strategy that put my mind at ease. The entire team was professional, responsive and genuinely caring throughout the whole process. They fought tirelessly and delivered a result that far exceeded my expectations. If you need a law firm you can trust completely, this is it. Thank you!
BKBryan KingGoogle review · Dec 2025
Why Tamou Law Group for Sex Crime Charges
A sex-crime allegation is usually one account against another, and the State files first and investigates second. We treat these cases as evidence cases from day one: digital records, forensic interviews, timelines and the gaps between them.
A dismissal on the hardest charge
Our published results include a sexual assault and sexual abuse case dismissed after extensive litigation, and reductions on luring, sexual conduct with a minor, molestation and sexual exploitation charges. These are the cases most firms plead early.
Former prosecutors who charged these cases
Attorneys on our team have worked inside the offices that file sex-crime charges in Arizona. They know how forensic interviews are scored, what a detective needs before a confrontation call, and which weaknesses the State hopes you never notice.
Pre-charge defense
Sex-crime cases often begin with a detective’s call, before any charge exists. That window is where a case is declined, downgraded or filed as alleged, and we have handled that stage from both sides of the table.
Published results in this area
| Case | Charges | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| State v. W.N. | Sexual assault and sexual abuse (A.R.S. 13-1406, 13-1404) | Case dismissed |
| State v. P.J. | Sexual abuse and indecent exposure (13-1404, 13-1402) | Reduced charge |
| State v. N.D. | Luring a minor and attempt (13-3554, 13-1001) | Reduced charge |
| State v. L.B. | Sexual conduct with a minor and attempt (13-1405, 13-1001) | Reduced charge |
| State v. H.V. | Molestation of a child and sexual abuse (13-1410, 13-1404) | Reduced charge |
| State v. V.R. | Sexual exploitation of a minor (13-3553) | Reduced charge |
| State v. G.D. | Indecent exposure and disorderly conduct (13-1402, 13-2904) | Deferred prosecution |
Anonymized outcomes from our case results page. Every case is different; past results do not guarantee a future outcome.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Arizona a one-party consent state for recording?
Yes, for audio. Under A.R.S. 13-3005 and the exemption in 13-3012(9), recording a conversation is lawful if you are a party to it or any party consents. Intercepting other people’s conversations without consent is a Class 5 felony.
Can I legally record a phone call I am part of in Arizona?
Yes. As a party to the call, your own consent satisfies Arizona’s one-party consent rule. Be careful with interstate calls, some states require all parties to consent, and recording a call with someone in such a state can create exposure there.
What is ARS 13-3019?
Arizona’s surreptitious recording statute. It makes it a felony to secretly photograph, film, digitally record, or even view a person without consent in a bathroom, bedroom, locker room, or similar private situation, or to capture private body areas not visible to the public.
What class of felony is secret recording in Arizona?
A Class 5 felony when a device is used, a Class 6 felony for secret viewing without a device (Class 5 on a second offense), and a Class 4 felony for disclosing or publishing such a recording when the person depicted is recognizable.
Is sharing an intimate recording a crime in Arizona?
Yes, twice over. Disclosing a recording made in violation of 13-3019 is a Class 4 felony if the person is recognizable, and unlawful disclosure of intimate images under A.R.S. 13-1425 (the revenge porn law) can apply even to recordings originally made with consent.
Can I record someone in my own house in Arizona?
Not in private situations. The statute turns on the recorded person’s reasonable expectation of privacy, not property ownership, secretly recording a partner, guest, or roommate in a bedroom or bathroom is inside the statute regardless of whose house it is.
Are security cameras legal in Arizona?
Yes, with limits. The statute exempts security recording when notice is clearly posted in locations where privacy is expected, and ordinary outdoor and common-area cameras do not implicate 13-3019 at all. Hidden cameras in bathrooms or bedrooms are another matter entirely.
What’s the difference between 13-3019 and voyeurism?
Voyeurism (A.R.S. 13-1424) targets surveilling a person for sexual gratification, while 13-3019 targets the secret recording or viewing itself, no sexual-gratification element required. Prosecutors choose between them, and the choice affects class and registration exposure.
Does a conviction under 13-3019 require sex offender registration?
It can, courts have discretion to order registration for offenses committed for sexual gratification, and related charges like voyeurism carry their own exposure. Avoiding registration is a central goal of the defense in every one of these cases.
What should I do if police want my phone in a recording investigation?
Do not consent to the search and do not delete anything, deletion can become its own charge. Ask for a lawyer before any interview; the phone search, the consent evidence, and the charging choice all need immediate professional attention.
Two Arizona Offices, One Team
We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.
Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
(function() {
function customizeConsultForm() {
var form = document.querySelector('#consult-form');
if (!form) return false;
var fields = form.querySelectorAll('.gfield');
var emailField = null;
var didWork = false;
fields.forEach(function(field) {
var label = field.querySelector('.gfield_label, label');
if (!label) return;
var labelText = (label.textContent || '').trim().toLowerCase();
if (labelText.indexOf('best way to reply') !== -1 || labelText.indexOf('preferred contact') !== -1) {
field.classList.add('tlg-hide-field');
field.querySelectorAll('input').forEach(function(input) {
input.checked = false;
input.removeAttribute('required');
});
didWork = true;
}
if (labelText.indexOf('email') !== -1) {
emailField = field;
field.classList.add('tlg-email-required');
field.querySelectorAll('input[type="email"], input[type="text"]').forEach(function(input) {
input.setAttribute('required', 'required');
input.setAttribute('aria-required', 'true');
});
didWork = true;
}
});
var gform = form.tagName === 'FORM' ? form : (form.querySelector('form') || form.closest('form'));
if (!gform) gform = document.querySelector('#consult-form form, form[id^="gform_"]');
if (gform && !gform.dataset.tlgSourceBound) {
gform.dataset.tlgSourceBound = '1';
var pageUrl = window.location.href;
var pageTitle = document.title || 'Phoenix White Collar Defense Lawyers';
var pagePath = window.location.pathname;
var sourceTag = '[Source: ' + pageTitle.replace(/\s*[,|].*$/, '') + ' | ' + pagePath + ']';
['source_page', 'page_url', 'lander_url'].forEach(function(name) {
var h = document.createElement('input');
h.type = 'hidden';
h.name = name;
h.value = pageUrl;
gform.appendChild(h);
});
var hp = document.createElement('input');
hp.type = 'hidden';
hp.name = 'source_path';
hp.value = pagePath;
gform.appendChild(hp);
function findMessageField() {
var match = null;
form.querySelectorAll('.gfield').forEach(function(field) {
var label = field.querySelector('.gfield_label, label');
if (!label) return;
var t = (label.textContent || '').trim().toLowerCase();
if (t.indexOf('message') !== -1 || t.indexOf('comment') !== -1 || t.indexOf('detail') !== -1 || t.indexOf('describe') !== -1 || t.indexOf('tell us') !== -1 || t.indexOf('your story') !== -1) {
match = field.querySelector('textarea, input[type="text"]');
}
});
if (!match) match = form.querySelector('textarea');
return match;
}
function prependSource() {
var textarea = findMessageField();
if (textarea && textarea.value.indexOf('[Source:') === -1) {
textarea.value = sourceTag + '\n\n' + (textarea.value || '');
}
}
gform.addEventListener('submit', prependSource, true);
var submitBtns = gform.querySelectorAll('input[type="submit"], button[type="submit"], .gform_button');
submitBtns.forEach(function(btn) {
btn.addEventListener('click', function() {
setTimeout(prependSource, 0);
prependSource();
}, true);
});
}
var submitBtn = form.querySelector('input[type="submit"], button[type="submit"]');
if (submitBtn && emailField && !submitBtn.dataset.tlgBound) {
submitBtn.dataset.tlgBound = '1';
submitBtn.addEventListener('click', function(e) {
var emailInput = emailField.querySelector('input[type="email"], input[type="text"]');
if (emailInput && !emailInput.value.trim()) {
e.preventDefault();
emailInput.focus();
emailInput.style.borderColor = '#c62828';
emailInput.style.boxShadow = '0 0 0 3px rgba(198,40,40,.15)';
}
});
}
return didWork;
}
if (document.readyState === 'loading') {
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', customizeConsultForm);
} else {
customizeConsultForm();
}
var attempts = 0;
var interval = setInterval(function() {
attempts++;
var done = customizeConsultForm();
if (done || attempts > 10) clearInterval(interval);
}, 500);
})();







