Felony Theft & Theft Over $100,000 in Arizona

What Counts as Felony Theft Over $100,000 in Arizona?

Our Team Has Seen

Both Sides

Former Prosecutors · Law Enforcement · Public Defenders

When you call Tamou Law Group, you reach a firm that handles criminal defense exclusively, with serious experience defending high-value theft, aggregated fraud, and other white-collar cases across Arizona. Our team includes former prosecutors and law enforcement officers, so we know exactly how the State builds these cases, and where they fall apart.

At many large firms, the name on the building is a marketing figurehead, you rarely get them on the phone and your case goes to a junior associate. When you hire Tamou Law Group, your case is handled by a full team of attorneys, not associates, including Michael Tamou.

If you’ve been charged with felony theft or accused of taking property worth $100,000 or more in Arizona, you probably have urgent questions about what you’re facing and what comes next. Here are straight answers to the questions people ask most, with a plain-English breakdown of the law under A.R.S. § 13-1802, how prosecutors use aggregation to reach the $100,000 mark, the penalties, and the defenses that matter most.

Is Theft Over $100,000 Always Prison Time in Arizona?

In most cases, yes. Under A.R.S. § 13-1802, the felony class for theft is set by dollar value, and once the value reaches $25,000 the charge is already a Class 2 felony. But at $100,000 or more, A.R.S. § 13-1802(H) adds a separate, harsher rule: the person ‘is not eligible for suspension of sentence, probation, pardon or release from confinement’ until the prison sentence has been served. That means a conviction at $100,000+ carries real prison time as a matter of law, not judicial discretion, which is why the fight over the exact loss amount and how it was calculated happens long before sentencing.

How Does the State Add Up Amounts to Reach $100,000?

Prosecutors rarely need one giant theft to reach $100,000. Under A.R.S. § 13-1801(B), the State ‘may aggregate in the indictment or information amounts taken in thefts committed pursuant to one scheme or course of conduct, whether the amounts were taken from one or several persons.’ In practice, that means dozens or hundreds of smaller transactions, small false insurance claims, padded invoices, or repeated skimming, can be added together into a single, much larger felony count. This is exactly how many AHCCCS and healthcare billing fraud cases reach the $100,000 mandatory-prison threshold: no single claim looks large, but the State totals every claim it says belongs to ‘one scheme.’ Breaking that aggregation, showing the claims were not part of one connected scheme, is one of the most powerful defenses in a high-value theft case.

What Does the State Have to Prove for Felony Theft?

The State must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that you knowingly controlled property of another with intent to deprive the owner of it, or that you obtained property or services by a material misrepresentation with that same intent. Both paths appear constantly in high-value cases: straightforward taking or diversion of funds, and fraud-based theft built on false statements, false billing, or fabricated documentation. Either way, intent is the battleground, an accounting dispute, a valuation disagreement, or a good-faith belief in authorization is a defense, not proof of a crime.

Can Paying Restitution Drop the Charge Below $100,000?

Sometimes, but not automatically. Below $100,000, full restitution and strong mitigation routinely move a case from a prison-range plea to probation. At $100,000 or more, A.R.S. § 13-1802(H) makes prison mandatory regardless of how much is later repaid, restitution does not undo that statute. What can matter is the loss amount itself: if the true, provable loss is under $100,000, or under a lower felony threshold, restitution and an accurate, independently tested valuation before any plea can keep the mandatory-prison provision from ever applying in the first place.

What’s the Difference Between Felony Theft and Fraudulent Schemes?

Both are theft-related, but they are different statutes with different elements. Felony theft (A.R.S. § 13-1802) punishes knowingly controlling or obtaining another’s property, including by misrepresentation, with intent to deprive. Fraudulent schemes (A.R.S. § 13-2310) targets a knowing, systematic scheme or artifice to defraud, and it is often charged alongside theft in billing-fraud and investment cases. Prosecutors frequently stack both charges in the same indictment when a pattern of false claims or misrepresentations both took property and formed a broader scheme.

Is High-Value Theft Charged in State or Federal Court?

Most high-value theft in Arizona is charged in Maricopa County Superior Court by the County Attorney under A.R.S. § 13-1802. But schemes that cross state lines, use interstate wires, or target federal healthcare programs like AHCCCS/Medicaid can also draw federal attention from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the FBI, or HHS–OIG, particularly in kickback and billing-fraud investigations. It is possible to face parallel state and federal exposure on the same underlying conduct, which changes both the strategy and the stakes.

How Value Sets the Felony Theft Charge in Arizona

Felony theft is graded entirely by the dollar value of the property or services involved, and that value drives both the felony class and, at $100,000 and up, whether prison is mandatory. Establishing the true, provable value, and whether separate claims can lawfully be aggregated, is the central defense question in every high-value case.

*Ranges are for a first offense and vary with priors and aggravators. At $100,000 or more, A.R.S. § 13-1802(H) makes the prison sentence mandatory, no suspended sentence, probation, pardon, or release before the term is served, regardless of restitution.