Call Us
Contact Us
Text Us
Call or Text Today 623-321-4699

Is It Illegal to Record Sex in Arizona? ARS 13-3019

Is It Illegal to Record Sex in Arizona? ARS 13-3019

Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Sex Crime Defense

5.0 · Sex Crime Defense

Recording an intimate encounter is lawful in Arizona only if everyone consented. Without that consent it is A.R.S. § 13-3019, and sharing it later is a separate felony that turns on intent, not on the recording itself. Two crimes, two defenses.

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal Defense2025 Super Lawyers SouthwestNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association
Michael Tamou, Arizona criminal defense attorney

Michael Tamou

Founding Attorney · Sex Crime Defense

★★★★★ 5.0 · Sex Crime Defense

Written and legally reviewed by Michael Tamou, Founding Attorney of Tamou Law Group, PLLC. Last updated September 5, 2026.

As Seen On

As Seen On NBC News, USA Today, Digital Journal, AZ Central, Lamar, ABC News, Fox News

Recognized By

NTL Top 100 Trial LawyersNTL Top 40 Under 40 Trial LawyersElite Lawyer 2026 Criminal DefenseNational College For DUI DefenseDUI Defense Lawyers Association2025 Super Lawyers Southwest

Is It Illegal to Record Sex in Arizona?

Not if everyone in the recording consented to being recorded. Recording a partner without their consent where they expect privacy is surreptitious recording under A.R.S. § 13-3019, a class 5 felony, and voyeurism under § 13-1424 if it was for sexual stimulation. Sharing it later is a separate offense under § 13-1425.

It depends entirely on consent, and on which consent. Recording a sexual encounter is not a crime in Arizona when everyone in the recording agreed to be recorded. It becomes a felony the moment one person did not: recording someone without their consent where they expect privacy is surreptitious recording under A.R.S. § 13-3019, a class 5 felony. Sharing the recording later is a separate offense with separate elements, and agreeing to be recorded is not agreeing to be shared.

Is It Legal If Both People Agreed to Be Recorded?

Yes. Two adults who both know about and agree to a recording of their own sexual activity have committed no offense in Arizona. There is no statute criminalising a consensual private recording between adults, and the file itself is lawful to make and to keep.

Two cautions attach to that, and both are the reason people end up charged anyway. First, consent has to be actual and contemporaneous. A partner who knew about a camera on one occasion has not consented to every later recording, and consent given while a person is asleep, unconscious or too intoxicated to understand is not consent at all. Second, the recording being lawful to make says nothing about whether it is lawful to keep sharing, which is where the serious exposure sits.

What If I Recorded Without My Partner Knowing?

That is the felony. Under § 13-3019 it is unlawful to knowingly record, or by any other means secretly view, another person without that person’s consent either in a location where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy while undressed or engaged in sexual contact, or in a manner that captures genitalia, buttock or breast not otherwise visible to the public. A bedroom is the textbook example of that first category.

  • § 13-3019 is a class 5 felony, or a class 6 felony if no device was used. The State does not have to prove why you did it;
  • Voyeurism under § 13-1424 is the parallel charge and adds one element the State must prove: that the invasion of privacy was for the purpose of sexual stimulation. It is also a class 5 felony;
  • Prosecutors frequently charge both from a single recording, and each recording is typically charged as its own count.

The difference between the two matters more than it looks, because of where each sits in the criminal code. We break that down in surreptitious recording defense under § 13-3019 and whether voyeurism is a felony in Arizona.

No, and this is the single most common misunderstanding in these cases. Permission to make a recording is permission to make a recording. Disclosing it to anyone else is governed by a different statute, § 13-1425, unlawful disclosure of images depicting nudity or specific sexual activities, and that statute contains its own consent requirement: disclosure made with the consent of the person depicted is exempt, and disclosure without it is not.

The statute also forecloses the argument defendants most often arrive with. It says in terms that evidence a person sent an image to another person using an electronic device does not, on its own, remove that person’s reasonable expectation of privacy in it. Receiving a photo or a video willingly does not make it yours to pass on. See also whether screenshotting a nude photo is illegal in Arizona.

What Does the State Have to Prove Under § 13-1425?

All three of the following, and the third is where these cases are won:

  1. The person is identifiable from the image or from information displayed with it, and is depicted in a state of nudity or engaged in specific sexual activities;
  2. The depicted person had a reasonable expectation of privacy;
  3. The image was disclosed with the intent to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten or coerce that person.

That third element is a specific intent, and it is not satisfied by the disclosure being hurtful in hindsight. Showing a recording to one friend while drunk, an image syncing to a shared cloud account or a family tablet, a phone handed to someone who scrolled too far, a device seized and its contents circulated by other people: none of those are, by themselves, a disclosure made to harm or coerce anyone. The statute also expressly does not reach reporting unlawful conduct, legal proceedings, medical treatment, or images involving voluntary exposure in a public or commercial setting.

⚠️ Why this matters: The intent element is exactly what a detective’s interview is designed to supply. “I wanted her to know how it felt” or “I was angry, so I sent it” converts a case the State could not otherwise prove into one it can. This is the single most damaging thing people say in these interviews.

What If Someone in the Recording Was Under 18?

Then none of the above is the charge, and the exposure is in a different universe. Recording a person under 18 engaged in sexual conduct is sexual exploitation of a minor under § 13-3553, a class 2 felony, and if the minor is under fifteen it is punishable under § 13-705 as a dangerous crime against children, which carries mandatory prison. Consent is irrelevant. The minor’s own agreement is irrelevant. Believing they were older is not a defense the statute provides for.

This reaches situations people genuinely do not expect, including a recording two teenagers make of themselves. Where both participants are juveniles, Arizona provides a separate route in A.R.S. § 8-309, unlawful use of an electronic communication device by a minor, which handles the conduct in juvenile court as a petty offense, or a class 3 misdemeanor if the depiction was sent to more than one person. That statute exists precisely so teenagers are not prosecuted as child pornographers, but it applies to juveniles. An adult in the same fact pattern is facing § 13-3553.

If this is the situation, stop reading and call a lawyer. See sexting and minors in Arizona and sexual exploitation charges.

Can I Be Charged If the Recording Was Never Shared?

Yes. Section 13-3019 and voyeurism are complete at the moment of the recording. Nothing has to be sent to anyone. Distribution is not an element of either offense; it is an aggravator that raises § 13-3019 to a class 4 felony where the recording is disclosed and the person depicted is recognizable, and it is what triggers § 13-1425 as a separate charge. A recording that never left the phone is still a felony if the other person did not consent to it being made.

What Should You Do If You Are Accused?

  • Do not delete anything. Once you know an investigation exists, deleting files, messages or an account is tampering with physical evidence under § 13-2809, a class 6 felony that is usually far easier to prove than the recording charge, and forensic examiners recover deleted files anyway;
  • Do not contact the other person to explain, apologise or ask them to drop it. Those messages become the intent evidence in a § 13-1425 case, and can add witness tampering;
  • Do not consent to a search of your phone or hand over a passcode. Ask whether there is a warrant;
  • Do not do the interview. A detective calling about this is looking for the consent and intent elements. See what to do when a detective calls;
  • Preserve what helps you. Messages establishing consent, the context of the recording, and who had access to the device are the defense, and they disappear fast.
Key takeaway: Recording sex in Arizona is lawful when everyone in the recording consented to being recorded. Recording a partner without their consent is a class 5 felony under A.R.S. 13-3019, and voyeurism under 13-1424 if the State can prove a sexual purpose. Sharing it is a separate offense under 13-1425 that requires proof of intent to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten or coerce, which is the element most of these cases turn on. If anyone in the recording was under 18, it is sexual exploitation of a minor under 13-3553, a class 2 felony, and consent is no defense.
Our Defense Team

The Experts We Bring to the Table

These cases are decided by two things: what the messages show about consent, and what the device shows about intent. We bring the people who establish both.

Digital Forensic Examiners

What the Device Actually Shows

Establish who recorded, when, what synced automatically, and who else had access to the account or the phone.

Investigators

The Consent Record

Recover the messages, history and context between the parties that establish consent, which the police report almost never includes.

Fourth Amendment Counsel

The Phone Search

Test the warrant that produced the images. Device warrants routinely reach further than the probable cause behind them.

Sentencing & Registration Counsel

Keeping Registration Off the Table

Attack the sexual motivation allegation under § 13-118 separately, because it is what makes registration available to the judge at all.

Psychosexual Evaluators

Used Only When It Helps

Private, privileged evaluations that support a non-registration outcome and are disclosed only if we choose to disclose them.

Mitigation Specialists

A First Offense, Handled

Build the record that keeps a first offense on probation rather than in prison.

How Tamou Law Group Defends Recording and Disclosure Cases

We separate the two questions the State tends to blur together: was the recording lawfully made, and was it unlawfully shared. Those are different statutes with different elements, and a client is frequently exposed on one and not the other. On the recording count we test consent and the expectation of privacy. On a § 13-1425 count we go straight at the intent element, because a disclosure that was careless, drunk or automatic is not a disclosure made to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten or coerce anyone.

We image and examine the devices independently rather than accepting the State’s forensic report, and we treat any § 13-118 sexual motivation allegation as its own fight, because that allegation is what puts registration within the judge’s reach. Read the statutes yourself: § 13-3019, § 13-1424, § 13-1425 and § 13-3553, or look up any Arizona statute in our Arizona Criminal Code search. Related guides: is it illegal to record someone in Arizona, unlawful disclosure of intimate images, and our Arizona sex crimes practice. Call 623-321-4699, 24/7.

Awards & Recognition

Our recognition for Phoenix sex crime defense is independently verified, click any award to confirm it:

When you are looking for the best Phoenix sex crime lawyers, these are the independently verified credentials that matter, earned by Founding Attorney Michael Tamou and a full team of attorneys, including former prosecutors, public defenders, and law enforcement.

Client Reviews

What Clients Say About Tamou Law

Real Google reviews from clients we have defended across Phoenix and Maricopa County. Every review is from a criminal defense client, never padded with non-legal work.

5.0
Google Rating
1,000+
Cases Won
100%
Criminal Defense
24/7
Availability
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it illegal to record sex in Arizona?

Not if every person in the recording consented to being recorded. Recording a partner without their consent, in a place where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy, is surreptitious recording under A.R.S. 13-3019, a class 5 felony, and can also be charged as voyeurism under 13-1424 if the State proves it was for sexual stimulation.

Is it illegal to record someone during sex without them knowing?

Yes. That is the core of A.R.S. 13-3019, which makes it a class 5 felony to knowingly record another person without consent where they expect privacy while nude or engaged in sexual contact. It is a class 6 felony if no device was used, and a class 4 felony if the recording is later distributed and the person is recognizable.

Can my partner consent to being recorded and then take it back?

Consent cannot be withdrawn retroactively for a recording that was already lawfully made, but it absolutely governs what happens next. Any later disclosure needs consent at the time of that disclosure, because A.R.S. 13-1425 exempts only disclosures made with the depicted person’s consent. Withdrawal also means no further recordings.

Is sharing a sex video without consent a crime in Arizona?

It can be, under A.R.S. 13-1425. The State must prove the person is identifiable and depicted in nudity or sexual activity, that they had a reasonable expectation of privacy, and that the disclosure was made with intent to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten or coerce. Without that specific intent the statute is not satisfied.

Does sending someone a nude photo mean they can share it?

No. A.R.S. 13-1425 states expressly that evidence a person sent an image using an electronic device does not, on its own, remove that person’s reasonable expectation of privacy in the image. Receiving something willingly is not permission to pass it on to anyone else.

Can I be charged if I never shared the recording?

Yes. Both 13-3019 and 13-1424 are complete when the recording is made. Distribution is not an element of either offense, only an aggravator that raises 13-3019 to a class 4 felony and triggers 13-1425 as a separate charge. A recording that never left your phone is still a felony if the other person never consented.

What if the other person was under 18?

Then it is sexual exploitation of a minor under A.R.S. 13-3553, a class 2 felony, punishable under 13-705 as a dangerous crime against children if the minor is under fifteen. Consent is not a defense and neither is a mistake about age. Where both participants are juveniles, A.R.S. 8-309 handles it in juvenile court instead.

Is Arizona a one-party consent state for recording sex?

One-party consent under A.R.S. 13-3005 governs audio interception, not video of intimate activity. Filming a person nude or in sexual contact without consent is prosecuted under 13-3019 and 13-1424 regardless of the audio rule, so the one-party consent answer people find online does not apply to this situation.

Do you have to register as a sex offender for recording sex without consent?

Not automatically. Neither 13-3019 nor 13-1424 is in the mandatory registration list at A.R.S. 13-3821(A). A judge may order registration for a chapter 14 offense such as voyeurism, or for any offense where the State proved a sexual motivation allegation under A.R.S. 13-118. A 13-3553 conviction is a different matter entirely.

What should I do if I am accused of recording someone during sex?

Do not delete anything, do not contact the other person, do not consent to a search of your phone, and do not give a detective an interview. Preserve the messages that establish consent and the context of the recording, then call a defense lawyer. Deleting evidence is a separate felony under A.R.S. 13-2809.

Visit Us

Two Arizona Offices, One Team

We serve all of Maricopa County and the surrounding area, with free, confidential consultations 24/7 by phone and in-person meetings at either office by appointment.

Case Results Disclaimer: The results described on this page are based on specific facts and circumstances and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee future results. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page or submitting a contact form until a written fee agreement has been signed. Tamou Law Group, PLLC is licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Related Posts: